PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Safety of spironolactone for dogs with heart valve disease and failure

By Lefebvre, H P et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2013·INP, France·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Safety of spironolactone in dogs with chronic heart failure because of degenerative valvular disease: a population-based, longitudinal study.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A study involving 196 dogs with heart failure due to degenerative valve disease found that those treated with spironolactone, along with standard heart medications, did not experience more side effects than those who only received standard treatment. The dogs were monitored for about 7 months, and while some dogs did pass away from heart or kidney issues, the ones on spironolactone had a significantly lower death rate from these causes. This suggests that spironolactone is a safe addition to heart failure treatment in dogs, helping manage their condition without increasing risks.

People also search for: dog heart failure treatment · spironolactone for dogs · heart medication side effects in dogs

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Spironolactone treatment in humans is associated with an increased risk of hyperkalemia and renal dysfunction. HYPOTHESIS: Dogs with cardiac disease treated with spironolactone, in addition to conventional therapy, are not at higher risk for adverse events (AEs) than those receiving solely conventional therapy. ANIMALS: One hundred and ninety-six client-owned dogs with naturally occurring myxomatous mitral valve disease. METHODS: Prospective, double-blinded field study with dogs randomized to receive either spironolactone (2 mg/kg once a day) or placebo in addition to conventional therapy (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, plus furosemide and digoxin if needed). Safety was compared between treatment groups, using the frequency of AEs, death caused by cardiac disease, renal disease, or both, and variations in serum sodium, potassium, urea, and creatinine concentrations. For the latter, population-specific reference intervals were established and out of range values (ORV) analyzed. RESULTS: The number of AEs was similar in the spironolactone and reference groups (188 and 208, respectively), when followed for median duration of 217 days (range [2-1,333]). At each study time point, the percentage of dogs showing ORV was similar between groups. There were a higher number of deaths because of cardiac disease, renal disease or both in the reference group (30.7% versus 13.7%) (P = .0043). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Dogs with heart failure receiving spironolactone in addition to conventional treatment are not at a higher risk for AEs, death caused by cardiac disease, renal disease, or both, hyperkalemia, or azotemia.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23869534/