Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Safety of ultrasound-guided pancreas needle biopsy in cats
By Crain, Sarah K et al.·Published in Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery·2014·Tufts University Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine, North Grafton, MA, USA, United States·View original on Crossref →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Safety of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of the feline pancreas: a case-control study
- Species:
- cat
Plain-English summary
A group of 73 cats with signs of pancreatic disease underwent a procedure called fine-needle aspiration (FNA) to collect samples from their pancreas using ultrasound guidance. The study found that the risk of complications from this procedure was similar to that of other cats with pancreatic disease that either had different organs sampled or no sampling at all. All groups had comparable survival rates after the procedure, and the pancreatic samples were successfully analyzed in about two-thirds of the cases. Overall, the FNA procedure appears to be safe for cats, but more research is needed to determine how useful it is for diagnosing pancreatic issues.
People also search for: cat pancreatic disease symptoms · fine-needle aspiration safety in cats · cat pancreas biopsy complications
Abstract
The safety of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of the feline pancreas has not been reported. The incidence of complications following ultrasound-guided pancreatic FNA in 73 cats (pancreatic aspirate [PA] cats) with clinical and ultrasonographic evidence of pancreatic disease was compared with complications in two groups of matched control cats also diagnosed with pancreatic disease that either had abdominal organs other than the pancreas aspirated (control FNA, n = 63) or no aspirates performed (control no FNA, n = 61). The complication rate within 48 h of the ultrasound and/or aspirate procedure did not differ among the PA cats (11%), control FNA (14%) or control no FNA (8%) cats. There was no difference in rate of survival to discharge (82%, 84% and 83%, respectively) or length of hospital stay among groups. The cytologic recovery rate for the pancreatic samples was 67%. Correlation with histopathology, available in seven cases, was 86%. Pancreatic FNA in cats is a safe procedure requiring further investigation to establish diagnostic value.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on Crossref: https://doi.org/10.1177/1098612x14557910