Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Safety of capsular tension rings in dog cataract surgery
By Wilkie, David A et al.·Published in Veterinary ophthalmology·2015·Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Safety study of capsular tension ring use in canine phacoemulsification and IOL implantation.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of dogs with cataracts underwent eye surgery to remove the cloudy lens and replace it with an artificial one. In some of these dogs, a capsular tension ring (CTR) was used during the procedure to help stabilize the lens. The study found that using the CTR did not lead to more complications during or after surgery compared to dogs that did not have the ring. Both groups had similar rates of issues like glaucoma and retinal detachment, suggesting that the CTR is a safe option for this type of eye surgery in dogs.
People also search for: dog cataract surgery risks · capsular tension ring for dogs · dog eye surgery complications
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare surgical outcome and complications in canine eyes with stable, cataractous lenses undergoing routine phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation with or without implantation of a capsular tension ring device (CTR). PROCEDURES: Dogs undergoing routine bilateral phacoemulsification and IOL implantation had one eye randomly chosen to have a CTR (47 eyes) inserted while the contralateral eye served as a control (47 eyes). The CTR was placed in the capsular bag following phacoemulsification and immediately prior to IOL implantation. All eyes received acrylic foldable IOLs. Patients were evaluated intra- and postoperatively, and complications were compared between eyes with and without a CTR. RESULTS: There were no intra-operative complications associated with implantation of the CTR. Postoperatively, the overall incidences of glaucoma (6%), intraocular hemorrhage (4%), and retinal detachment (2%) were equal between control and CTR eyes at the time of last follow-up. There was no significant difference in overall incidence of immediate postoperative uveitis (35% vs. 38%) or fibrin (19% vs. 15%) between control and CTR eyes. Follow-up time ranged from 2 weeks to 21 months. CONCLUSION: In canine eyes with stable cataractous lenses undergoing routine phacoemulsification and IOL implantation placement of a CTR does not increase the risk of intra- or postoperative complications.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25323424/