Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Satisfaction and regret after pelvic organ prolapse surgery: mesh vs
By Bryans H et al.ยท2026ยทAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, United StatesยทView original on Europe PMC โ
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research โ every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work โ
Original publication title: Satisfaction and Decisional Regret After Mesh Versus Non-Mesh Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery.
Plain-English summary
This study looked at how satisfied women were after having surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP), a condition where pelvic organs slip out of place, and whether they regretted their decision to have surgery, especially when comparing those who had mesh used in their surgery versus those who did not. Out of 250 women contacted, 110 participated, and they were followed up for about 970 days. The results showed that there were no significant differences in satisfaction or regret between the two groups, although some women who felt more regret were likely to have concerns about having a hysterectomy or not using mesh. Overall, most women reported being satisfied with their decision and had low levels of regret, suggesting that patient feelings and experiences are important in understanding the success of such surgeries.
Abstract
<h4>Introduction</h4>Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common condition that can have a significant impact on a woman's quality of life. While surgical success is often measured objectively, patient-centered metrics are equally important.<h4>Objective</h4>This study investigated satisfaction, decisional regret, and sexual function in patients who underwent POP surgery with or without mesh to better understand how patients define success.<h4>Study design</h4>This is a retrospective review of patients who underwent apical POP surgery from 2015 to 2023 at a single institution serving an ethnically diverse community. Demographic data were collected through chart review and surveys conducted via telephone calls. Patient satisfaction and decisional regret were measured with the validated modified Satisfaction with Decision Scale-Decision Regret Scale for pelvic floor disorders. Sexual function after surgery was measured with the validated 6-question Female Sexual Function Index and open-ended sexual health questions. Patients were compared by use of mesh during surgery (e.g., sacrocolpopexy) versus native tissue repair. Fischer's exact test was used to compare categorical variables and t-tests used to compare continuous variables with pโ<โ0.05 as significant.<h4>Results</h4>Of the 250 women contacted who underwent POP surgery between 2015 and 2023, 110 (44%) participated, with a median follow-up of 970 days (IQR 843). Forty (36%) and 70 (64%) patients underwent mesh versus native tissue repair, respectively. There were no significant differences in satisfaction (pโ=โ0.52) and regret (pโ=โ0.83) between mesh and non-mesh groups. Patients who experienced moderate-to-severe decisional regret were significantly more likely to report regret regarding undergoing hysterectomy (pโ=โ0.03) and not having had mesh placed at the time of their POP surgery (pโ<โ0.01), compared to those with mild regret. Fifteen patients (16%) reported sexual health concerns, which were significantly associated with lower satisfaction (pโ<โ0.01).<h4>Conclusions</h4>Patients who underwent POP surgery had low regret and high satisfaction with their decision at almost 3 years of follow-up. Regret and satisfaction did not significantly differ based on the use of mesh. Although overall regret was low, open-ended responses revealed nuanced concerns about hysterectomy, mesh, and sexual health, suggesting limitations of current assessment tools. Overall, this study highlights how patient-centered metrics could augment the determination of surgical success and better inform decision-making in patients considering POP surgery.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases โOriginal publication on Europe PMC: https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42046997