Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
How well CT and MRI find disc calcification in Dachshunds
By Rosenblatt, Alana Jayne et al.·Published in Acta veterinaria Scandinavica·2018·School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Australia·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Scorer and modality agreement for the detection of intervertebral disc calcification in Dachshunds.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 21 Dachshunds was examined for signs of intervertebral disc calcification, a condition that can lead to serious back problems. The dogs were screened using three imaging methods: X-rays, CT scans, and MRIs. The results showed that X-rays provided the most consistent results among different scorers, making them the best choice for checking for this issue in breeding dogs. While CT and MRI were also useful, they did not match the reliability of X-rays for detecting this condition.
People also search for: Dachshund back problems · intervertebral disc calcification in dogs · best imaging for dog spine issues
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Dachshund is a chondrodystrophic breed of dog predisposed to premature degeneration and calcification, and subsequent herniation, of intervertebral discs (IVDs). This condition is heritable in Dachshunds and breeding candidates are screened for radiographically detectable intervertebral disc calcification (RDIDC), a feature of advanced disc degeneration and a prognostic factor for clinical disease. RDIDC scoring has been previously shown to be consistent within scorers; however, strong scorer effect (subjectivity) was also reported. The aim of this study was to estimate the within- and between-scorer agreement (repeatability and reproducibility, respectively) of computed tomography (CT) scanning and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for scoring IVD calcification, and to compare these modalities with radiographic scoring. RESULTS: Twenty-one Dachshund dogs were screened for IVD calcification using the three imaging modalities. Three scorers scored each case twice, independently. Repeatability was highest for radiography (95.4%), and significantly higher than for CT (90.4%) but not MRI (93.8%). Reproducibility was also highest for radiography (92.9%), but not significantly higher than for CT or MRI (89.4% and 86.4%, respectively). Overall, CT scored IVDs differently than radiography and MRI (64.8% and 62.7% agreement, respectively), while radiography and MRI scored more similarly (85.7% agreement). CONCLUSIONS: Despite high precision for radiography, previous evidence of scorer subjectivity was confirmed, which was not generally observed with CT and MRI. The increased consistency of radiography may be related to prior scorer experience with the modality and RDIDC scoring. This study does not support replacing radiography with CT or MRI to screen for heritable IVD calcification in breeding Dachshunds; however, evaluation of dog-level precision and the accuracy of each modality is recommended.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30316295/