Secondary fastener (tape) placement on a blood pressure cuff causes interindividual Doppler blood pressure measurement variability in healthy large-breed dogs.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare Doppler blood pressure (DBP) measurements between blood pressure cuffs (BPCs) with and without a secondary fastener (tape) in healthy nonanesthetized large-breed dogs. ANIMALS: 28 healthy dogs. METHODS: Superficial palmar venous arch DBP measurements with and without tape on the BPC were performed in lateral recumbency with Doppler ultrasound. Each method was performed 6 consecutive times, with the final 5 values averaged. Bland-Altman plots were made and limits of agreement calculated. RESULTS: The limits of agreement were -40.8 (95% CI, -55.6 to -26.0) to 45.6 (95% CI, 30.8 to 60.4), indicating that the DBP measured with tape would be expected to be between 40.8 mm Hg below and 45.6 mm Hg above that measured without tape 95% of the time. The mean bias estimate was 2.4 mm Hg (SD, 22.0; 95% CI, -6.1 to 11.0; P = .724), indicating that DBP measurements with tape averaged 2.4 mm Hg higher than without tape. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Doppler blood pressure measurements obtained with secondary fasteners on the BPCs differed by > 10 mm Hg compared to the BPCs' standard hook-and-loop fasteners 54% (30 of 56) of the time. Blood pressure cuffs with dysfunctional hook-and-loop fasteners should be replaced due to poor clinical reliability of DBP measurements. However, it is unclear whether Doppler sphygmomanometry is more accurate with the use of traditional Velcro BPC fasteners or with tape BPC fasteners.