Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
High detection rate for lymph node mapping in dogs with oral cancer
By Bae, Sohee et al.·Published in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association·2025·1Animal Health Partners, Canada·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Sentinel lymph node mapping with computed tomography lymphangiography and intraoperative methylene blue peritumoral injection has a high detection rate with moderate agreement in dogs with oral neoplasms.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 38 dogs with oral tumors underwent advanced imaging and a special dye injection to help identify cancer spread to lymph nodes. The techniques used were very effective, detecting nearly all cases of cancer spread and identifying sentinel lymph nodes (the first nodes that cancer would spread to) in 97% of the dogs. However, there were some differences in results between the two methods used, indicating that using both together is best for accurate mapping. This approach can help veterinarians better plan treatment for dogs with oral cancer.
People also search for: dog oral cancer treatment · lymph node mapping in dogs · canine cancer spread detection
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility of indirect CT lymphangiography (CTL) and intraoperative lymphangiography with methylene blue (IOL-MB) for sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping in canine oral cancer and to report both agreement between the techniques and accuracy of identifying metastatic lymph nodes (LNs). METHODS: This prospective study included 38 client-owned dogs with gross macroscopic or incompletely excised microscopic oral neoplasms. All dogs underwent CTL, IOL-MB, and extirpation of bilateral mandibular and retropharyngeal LNs. The detection rate of SLNs using the combined techniques was evaluated, and agreement between CTL and IOL-MB was assessed. RESULTS: The combined techniques identified all metastatic cases (4 of 4 dogs, 6 of 6 LNs) and achieved an SLN detection rate of 97.4% (37 of 38 dogs), with moderate agreement between modalities (76.8%; κ = 0.481). Nine cases showed discrepancies between the techniques, including 1 involving a metastatic LN. CONCLUSIONS: CTL and IOL-MB demonstrated moderate agreement and an excellent detection rate for SLNs. With moderate agreement between modalities, our results suggested that the relationship between mapped LNs and true SLNs is not always straightforward. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results of this study suggested that SLN mapping techniques are most effective when there is no evidence of overt clinical LN metastasis. Employing at least 2 modalities is advisable, as metastasis may impact SLN identification rates depending on the technique utilized.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40738145/