PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Rickettsia felis exposure risk in dogs from Queensland and Northern

By Hii, Sze-Fui et al.·Published in Parasites & vectors·2013·School of Veterinary Science, Australia·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Seroprevalence and risk factors for Rickettsia felis exposure in dogs from Southeast Queensland and the Northern Territory, Australia.

Species:
cat

Plain-English summary

A study found that over half of the dogs tested in Southeast Queensland and the Northern Territory had been exposed to Rickettsia felis, a type of bacteria that can be carried by fleas. Specifically, 50.7% of the 292 dogs showed signs of exposure, with those receiving regular flea control being less likely to test positive. This highlights the importance of keeping your pet protected from fleas to reduce the risk of exposure to this bacteria. Owners should be vigilant about flea prevention to help keep their dogs healthy.

People also search for: dog flea prevention · Rickettsia felis exposure in dogs · why is my dog scratching · dog flea treatment options

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The recent detection of Rickettsia felis DNA in dogs in Australia suggests that dogs are potential mammalian reservoir hosts for this emerging rickettsia. To date, there is no published report addressing the seroprevalence of R. felis in dogs in Australia. METHODS: Antigens for R. felis were produced by inoculating confluent XTC-2 monolayer cell cultures with three pools of cat flea (Ctenocephalides felis) homogenates. Infection was confirmed by real-time (qPCR), conventional or nested PCRs targeting the ompB, gltA, 17 kDa and ompA genes. Two hundred and ninety-two dogs from Southeast Queensland and the Northern Territory were tested for the presence of R. felis antibodies using a microimmunofluorescence (IF) test and the seroprevalence and associated risk factors for exposure were determined using both uni- and multi-variate analyses. RESULTS: Rickettsia felis was successfully isolated in cell culture from all three cat-flea pools. One hundred and forty-eight dogs (50.7%) showed seropositivity with titres ≥64 and 54 (18.5%) with titres ≥128. At antibody titres ≥64, dogs with active ectoparasite control were less likely to be seropositive to R. felis (OR: 2.60; 95% CI: 1.20 - 5.56). CONCLUSIONS: This first reported isolation of R. felis in cell culture in Australia allowed for the production of antigen for serological testing of dogs. Results of this serological testing reflects the ubiquitous exposure of dogs to R. felis and advocate for owner vigilance with regards to ectoparasite control on domestic pets.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23731951/