PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Brucella canis infection rates in dogs from South Dakota Indian

By Daly, Russell et al.·Published in Preventive veterinary medicine·2020·Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Seroprevalence of Brucella canis in dogs rescued from South Dakota Indian reservations, 2015-2019.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of nearly 4,000 dogs from South Dakota Indian reservations were tested for Brucella canis, a bacteria that can cause an infectious disease in dogs and potentially affect humans. About 6.8% of these dogs tested positive for the infection, with older and unaltered dogs being more likely to be infected. The study highlighted the importance of screening stray dogs for this bacteria before they are adopted to prevent spreading the infection to other pets and people.

People also search for: dog brucellosis symptoms · how to test for Brucella canis in dogs · stray dog health screening

Abstract

Canine brucellosis, caused by Brucella canis, is an infectious disease with implications for canine as well as human health. The identification of infected dogs originating from and around two South Dakota Indian reservations prompted an examination of the seroprevalence of B. canis in stray or owner-surrendered dogs from these communities. Using results from in-clinic screening tests of 3898 dogs over more than 4 years, we determined an overall apparent B. canis seroprevalence of 6.8% (adjusted estimated true prevalence of 29.4%), with rates declining over time. The apparent rate was similar to other surveys of stray dog populations in the US. Older dogs were significantly more likely to be B. canis-positive than younger dogs, as were reproductively intact dogs versus altered dogs (although this difference was not statistically significant). There were geographic differences in seropositive rates as well, with higher rates found in dogs originating from one reservation compared to other locations. Current diagnostic tests lack sensitivity to effectively identify all B. canis-infected dogs, but results from this study are valuable for investigating differences among risk factors for infection. Because of the potential for B. canis to infect other dogs and people, stray dog populations should be screened for B. canis before those animals are placed in adoptive homes.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33002657/