PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Torasemide vs furosemide for heart failure in 366 dogs

By Chetboul, V et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2017·Alfort Cardiology Unit, France·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Short-Term Efficacy and Safety of Torasemide and Furosemide in 366 Dogs with Degenerative Mitral Valve Disease: The TEST Study.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of 366 dogs with congestive heart failure (CHF) due to degenerative mitral valve disease (DMVD) were treated with either torasemide, given once a day, or furosemide, given twice a day. The study found that torasemide was just as effective as furosemide and even reduced the risk of serious heart-related issues by half compared to furosemide. Both medications helped manage the dogs' heart failure symptoms, but torasemide may offer a more convenient dosing schedule. This means that if your dog is struggling with CHF, torasemide could be a good option to discuss with your vet.

People also search for: dog congestive heart failure treatment · torasemide for dogs · furosemide side effects in dogs

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Furosemide is the only loop diuretic recommended by the ACVIM consensus guidelines for treatment of congestive heart failure (CHF) in dogs related to degenerative mitral valve disease (DMVD). Torasemide is another potent loop diuretic with a longer half-life and a higher bioavailability. OBJECTIVES: (1) To demonstrate that torasemide given once a day (q24h) is noninferior to furosemide given twice a day (q12h) for treating dogs with CHF; (2) and to compare the effect of the 2 drugs on the time to reach a composite cardiac endpoint "spontaneous cardiac death, euthanasia due to heart failure or CHF class worsening." ANIMALS: A total of 366 dogs with CHF attributable to DMVD. METHODS: Analysis of 2 prospective randomized single-blinded reference-controlled trials was performed. Dogs orally received either torasemide q24h (n = 180) or furosemide q12h (n = 186) in addition to standard CHF therapy over 3 months. The primary efficacy criterion was the percentage of dogs with treatment success assessed in each study. The time to reach the composite cardiac endpoint was used as secondary criterion in the overall population. RESULTS: Torasemide was noninferior to furosemide (P - P = +7%; 95% CI [-8%; +22%] and P - P = +1%; 95% CI [-12%; +14%], respectively, in Study 1 and Study 2). Torasemide (median dose = 0.24 mg/kg/d q24h; range = 0.10-0.69 mg/kg/d) was associated with a 2-fold reduction in the risk of reaching the composite cardiac endpoint (adjusted HR = 0.47; 95% CI = 0.27-0.82; P = 0.0077) as compared with furosemide (median dose = 1.39 mg/kg q12h; range = 0.70-6.30 mg/kg q12h). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Torasemide q24h is an effective oral diuretic in dogs with CHF.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28975664/