PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Epidural pain relief helps dogs after cystoscopy procedure

By Rayhel, Laura H et al.Ā·Published in Journal of veterinary internal medicineĀ·2021Ā·Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, United StatesĀ·View original on PubMed →

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Short-term efficacy of epidural pain management in dogs undergoing cystoscopy.

Species:
dog
Drinking & peeingDogs

Plain-English summary

A group of 26 dogs undergoing a cystoscopy (a procedure to examine the bladder) were given either epidural anesthesia or no epidural at all to see how it affected their pain after the procedure. While all dogs tolerated the epidural well, those who did not receive it showed more pain afterward. However, the study did not find a clear advantage in pain relief for the dogs that received the epidural. More research is needed to understand how effective epidural anesthesia is for this type of procedure.

People also search for: dog cystoscopy pain management Ā· epidural anesthesia for dogs Ā· post-surgery pain in dogs

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The effects of epidural anesthesia in dogs undergoing cystoscopy are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of epidural analgesia on postcystoscopy pain in dogs. ANIMALS: Twenty-six dogs undergoing routine cystoscopy for lower urinary tract disease. METHODS: Prospective, randomized, blinded observational study. Dogs were assigned either to a treatment group that received epidural anesthesia (preservative free morphine sulfate, 0.09 mg/kg; 1% ropivacaine, 0.2 mg/kg; total volume delivered, 1 mL/4.5 kg of body weight to a maximum of 10 mL; n = 9) or to a nonepidural control group (n = 13). Vital signs were monitored for 24 hours, and sedation and pain scores, behavioral assessments, and presence or absence of complications was evaluated for 5 days postprocedure. RESULTS: All dogs tolerated the epidural without complications. Four dogs were removed from the study because of status unblinding, lack of patient cooperation, or incomplete follow-up. No significant differences were noted in postprocedural pain scores in dogs that received epidural analgesia. Significant differences in postprocedural pain scores were noted in the nonepidural control group. No significant differences were noted in vital signs, behavioral assessments, or the proportion of dogs with a 50% increase in pain scores between the epidural and nonepidural groups. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Epidural anesthesia was well-tolerated. Dogs not receiving the epidural had poor postprocedural pain control. A consistent benefit for the epidural vs nonepidural group could not be identified. Additional studies are required to better assess the impact and efficacy of epidural anesthesia for cystoscopic procedures.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33538030/