PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Safety and results of robot-assisted hiatal hernia repair without mesh

By Li LT et al.·2026·Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, United States·View original on Europe PMC

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Short term safety and efficacy of robot-assisted laparoscopic redo hiatal hernia repair without mesh: a retrospective cohort study.

Plain-English summary

This study looked at the safety and effectiveness of a type of surgery called robot-assisted laparoscopic redo hiatal hernia repair, which is done without using mesh. The researchers reviewed the cases of 52 adult patients who had this surgery between April 2016 and March 2025. Most of the patients were around 63 years old and had symptoms like acid reflux and difficulty swallowing before the surgery. After the procedure, 88% of the patients felt better, and only a small number needed another surgery later on. Overall, the results suggest that this surgical method is safe and shows good short-term results.

Abstract

<h4>Background</h4>Recurrent hiatal hernia remains a challenging clinical problem. Failure rates after primary repair can be as high as 59%. Symptomatic patients often require reoperation. Although minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery is the standard approach, the reported outcomes of robot-assisted redo hiatal hernia repair performed without mesh reinforcement remains limited. This study reports the safety and efficacy of robot-assisted laparoscopic redo repair without mesh.<h4>Methods</h4>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive adult patients who underwent elective robot-assisted laparoscopic redo hiatal hernia repair across a multicentered health system from April 2016 to March 2025. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, preoperative testing, operative findings, repair technique, postoperative complications, and follow-up outcomes were collected through chart review. Primary efficacy outcomes were radiographic and symptomatic recurrences. Statistical analyses were conducted using Chi-squared for categorical variables and <i>t</i>-test for continuous variables.<h4>Results</h4>Fifty-two patients were included in the final analysis. Mean age was 63±9.7 years, 60% were women, and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 30±5 kg/m<sup>2</sup> at the time of reoperation. Most common preoperative symptoms were reflux (83%) and dysphagia (46%). The most common intraoperative finding was crural repair breakdown (73%). All procedures were completed robotically without mesh and without any conversions or intraoperative complications. The mean operative time was 224±55.1 min. The median length of stay was 2 days with interquartile range of 1 day. At a mean follow-up of 29.3±20.8 months, 88% reported improvement of symptoms, 13% completely discontinued antacid therapy, radiographic or endoscopic recurrence was observed in 38% and symptomatic recurrence in 27% with average time of discovery at 17.3±12.3 months. Only 4% required additional reoperation.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Robot-assisted laparoscopic redo hiatal hernia repair without mesh is safe and demonstrates favorable short-term outcomes. Further comparative prospective studies are needed to clarify long term durability relative to conventional laparoscopy and mesh usage.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on Europe PMC: https://europepmc.org/article/MED/41816392