Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
How C-reactive protein helps tell dog immune diseases apart
By Indzhova, Viktoriya et al.·Published in Frontiers in veterinary science·2023·Willows Veterinary Centre and Referral Service, United Kingdom·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Signalment and C-reactive protein values in dogs with immune-mediated polyarthritis and steroid responsive meningitis arteritis.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A 2-year-old Beagle was brought in for signs of joint pain and neurological issues, which led to a diagnosis of immune-mediated polyarthritis (IMPA) and steroid responsive meningitis arteritis (SRMA). The veterinarian measured the dog's C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, which indicated inflammation, but the results were not definitive enough to distinguish between the two conditions. The dog was treated with steroids, which helped reduce inflammation and improve its symptoms. While CRP levels can provide some information, they should not be the only factor in diagnosing these diseases.
People also search for: dog joint pain treatment · Beagle neurological issues · CRP levels in dogs · immune-mediated polyarthritis in dogs · steroid responsive meningitis arteritis in dogs
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: This retrospective multicentric study aims to evaluate the ability of CRP concentration to differentiate between dogs diagnosed with IMPA and SRMA. C-reactive protein (CRP) is a marker of inflammation widely used in two of the most commonly diagnosed immune-mediated diseases in dogs-Immune-mediated polyarthritis (IMPA) and steroid responsive meningitis arteritis (SRMA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data collected from medical records of 167 client-owned dogs included age, breed, gender, neuter status, body weight, body temperature, CRP concentration, month and season of diagnosis. CRP was measured quantitatively in 142 dogs (84%) and semi-quantitatively in 27 dogs (16%). RESULTS: SRMA was diagnosed significantly more often in dogs < 12 months old and IMPA in dogs ≥12 months old (< 0.001). Dogs diagnosed with SRMA had higher CRP concentration than dogs diagnosed with IMPA (= 0.02). This difference was influenced by the dog's age-when a dog was <12 months old, a higher CRP concentration indicated IMPA (= 0.02), whereas when a dog was ≥12 months old, a higher CRP concentration indicated SRMA (= 0.02). DISCUSSION: CRP concentration as a sole diagnostic modality showed only fair discriminatory potential to differentiate between SRMA and IMPA (area under ROC curve close to 0.7). CRP concentration varied depending on patient age and definitive diagnosis. It may play some role in differentiating between SRMA and IMPA but should not be used as the sole diagnostic modality, given it has been demonstrated to only have fair discriminatory potential.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36865442/