PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Cold plasma therapy may help treat infected dog ear infections

By Mueller, Ralf S & Bouassiba, Cosima·Published in Veterinary dermatology·2026·LMU Small Animal Clinic, Germany·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Single Cold Atmospheric Plasma Therapy May Improve the Treatment Outcome of Canine Otitis Externa With Secondary Infection.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of 21 dogs with ear infections (otitis externa) were treated for their condition, which often includes secondary bacterial or yeast infections. All dogs received an ear flush with saline, and one ear from each dog was treated with cold plasma therapy for 30 seconds, while both ears were also given a medication containing betamethasone, terbinafine, and florfenicol. After 21 days, the ears treated with cold plasma showed better improvement in yeast infections compared to those that did not receive this treatment. This suggests that cold plasma therapy could be a helpful addition to standard ear infection treatments.

People also search for: dog ear infection treatment · cold plasma therapy for dogs · otitis externa in dogs · yeast infection in dog ears

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Otitis externa (OE) with secondary bacterial or yeast infection is a common problem in small animal practice. Cold physical plasma (CPP) has been reported to have antimicrobial activity in vitro. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: This randomised, blinded, prospective study assessed the influence of additional CPP treatment on the recovery of canine OE with secondary infection. ANIMALS: Twenty-one dogs with bilateral clinical OE and cytological evidence of infection were included. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An ear flush was performed with saline solution in all dogs. Additionally, one ear of each dog, chosen in a prospective randomised fashion, was treated with CPP for 30 s. Afterwards, both ears were treated with a depot ear medication containing betamethasone, terbinafine and florfenicol. Seven days later, the depot medication was administered again as recommended by the manufacturer. On Day (D) 0, D7 and D21, a clinical otic score and a validated semiquantitative cytological score were compared with a Friedman test and Dunn's multiple comparison test. RESULTS: Ears treated additionally with CPP showed lower otic scores after 21 days compared to nontreated ears, although this difference was not significant (p = 0.08). Cytological scores improved over 21 days with cocci in CPP-treated (p = 0.003) and nontreated ears (p = 0.02). With yeast, there was significant improvement in CPP-treated (p = 0.0002) ears in contrast to nontreated ears. With rods, the improvement was not statistically significant in either group. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: CPP treatment seems to be a promising option as an additional treatment after ear flushing.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40926708/