Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
How consistent is stance analysis for dogs with hind leg lameness
By Wilson, Megan L et al.·Published in American journal of veterinary research·2019·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Single-day and multiday repeatability of stance analysis results for dogs with hind limb lameness.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 46 dogs with hind limb lameness had their weight distribution measured to see how consistent the results were over one day and multiple days. The measurements showed that the weight distribution on the affected leg and the opposite leg were reliable, meaning the same results could be expected if tested again. However, the measurements for the front legs were not as consistent. This information can help veterinarians better assess and monitor dogs with hind limb lameness using this analyzer, ensuring more accurate treatment plans.
People also search for: dog hind leg lameness treatment · weight distribution analysis for dogs · how to help dog with limping
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess single-day and multiday repeatability of weight distribution (stance) data obtained with a commercial analyzer for dogs with naturally occurring hind limb lameness. ANIMALS: 46 dogs (15 and 31 for single-day and multiday trials, respectively). PROCEDURES: For single-day trials, 5 to 10 measurements/trial were collected to determine body weight (BW), weight distribution on each limb, and forelimb and hind limb symmetry indices (SIs). The dog was removed from the room and returned immediately; 5 trials were performed. For multiday trials, measurements were performed in the same manner on 2 sequential days. Data were compared among trials (single-day measurements) and between days (multiday measurements). Repeatability (correlation coefficients and Lin concordance correlation coefficients [LCCCs]) and variability (coefficients of variation [CVs]) were assessed. RESULTS: In single-day trials, BW (r = 0.999), weight distribution on the lame hind limb (r = 0.915) and contralateral hind limb (r = 0.948), and hind limb SI (r = 0.964) were each significantly correlated among trials. In multiday trials, BW results were similar; weight distribution on the lame hind limb and contralateral hind limb and hind limb SI were each less closely but still significantly correlated between days. The LCCCs were highest for BW, weight distribution on the contralateral hind limb, and hind limb SI in single-day trials and for BW and weight bearing on the contralateral and lame hind limbs in multiday trials. The CVs were lowest for BW and highest for forelimb SI in both trial types. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The analyzer used allowed repeatable measurement of BW and weight distribution on the hind limbs of dogs with hind limb lameness. Measurement of forelimb stance variables was not repeatable in this group of dogs.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30919677/