Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Leptospirosis antibody rates and risks in Estonian cats
By Lehtla, Andžela et al.·Published in Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.)·2020·Institute of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: spp. in Cats in Estonia: Seroprevalence and Risk Factors for Seropositivity.
- Species:
- cat
Plain-English summary
A study in Estonia found that 12.8% of domestic cats tested positive for antibodies against leptospirosis, a bacterial disease that can affect both pets and humans. The research showed that outdoor cats were more likely to be infected, with a positivity rate of 17.2%, compared to just 3.9% for indoor cats. The study identified risk factors for infection, including outdoor access and being a shelter cat. To help protect your cat from this disease, it's best to keep them indoors and limit their exposure to potentially contaminated areas.
People also search for: cat leptospirosis symptoms · outdoor cat health risks · how to protect my cat from infections
Abstract
Leptospirosis is a zoonotic bacterial disease that affects humans and animals worldwide. Recently, more attention has been paid tospp. infections in domestic cats. In this seroepidemiological study, we estimated the prevalence of anti-spp. antibodies in domestic cats in Estonia and evaluated risk factors for the seropositivity. A total of 546 surplus feline plasma and serum samples, collected in collaboration with small animal clinics and an animal shelter in 2013 and 2015, were included in this study. The samples were tested for antibodies againstspp. using a microscopic agglutination test. The panel includedserovars Pomona, Icterohaemorrhagiae, Bratislava, Canicola, and Hardjo, andserovar Grippotyphosa. Titers ≥100 (positive reactions at dilutions ≥1/100) were considered positive. Anti-spp. antibodies were detected in 12.8% of the cats. The percentage of cats that tested positive for antibodies againstserovars Pomona, Icterohaemorrhagiae, Bratislava, Canicola, and Hardjo were 9.3%, 3.5%, 2.4%, 0.4%, and 0.2%, respectively, and the percentage of cats that tested positive for antibodies againstserovar Grippotyphosa was 7.3%. Of the seropositive cats, 46.5%, 35.2%, 12.7%, 4.2%, and 1.4% tested positive for 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 serovars, respectively. The prevalence of anti-spp. antibodies was 11.2% in pet cats and 16.3% in shelter cats. Among pet cats, the seroprevalence was over four times higher in cats that had access to the outdoors (17.2%) than in indoor cats (3.9%). Multivariable models, one based on data on pet cats only and another including also data on shelter cats, identified having access to the outdoors, being a shelter cat, and being from Western Estonia as the risk factors for seropositivity. Cats could be better protected from exposure tospp. by not allowing them to roam freely outdoors.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32202985/