PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Clindamycin works well for dog skin infections without recent

By W. Cooper Brookshire et al.·Published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science·2025·Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, United States, CH·View original on DOAJ

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Staphylococcal skin infection isolates from dogs without recent antibiotic exposure are 100% susceptible to clindamycin

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of dogs with bacterial skin infections were tested to see how well the bacteria would respond to different antibiotics. The study found that all the bacteria from dogs without a recent history of antibiotic use were completely susceptible to clindamycin, a common antibiotic for skin infections. This means that clindamycin is a safe and effective first choice for treating these infections in dogs that haven't been treated with antibiotics recently. Additionally, the bacteria were also sensitive to chlorhexidine, which can be used as a topical treatment.

People also search for: dog skin infection treatment · clindamycin for dog skin infection · chlorhexidine for dog skin problems

Abstract

The objective of this study was to create an antibiogram representative of bacterial skin infections in canine patients that would typically be treated empirically, i.e., without risk factors for antibiotic resistance, such as a history of recent antibiotic use, antibiotic treatment failure, or recurrent infections. Traditional antibiograms are a form of passive surveillance and report antibiotic susceptibility of isolates from a specific laboratory, hospital, or region for a given period of time. However, traditional antibiograms are biased towards more resistance, because infections that have antibiotic susceptibility tests are more likely to be resistant, due to risk factors such as recent antibiotic treatment, hospitalization, or a history of previous antibiotic-resistant infections. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed on 67 pathogenic canine staphylococcal isolates (62 Staphylococcus pseudintermedius and 5 Staphylococcus schleiferi) from patients who met the study inclusion criteria, and 100% of isolates were susceptible to antibiotics commonly prescribed for canine staphylococcal skin infections, including clindamycin. Additionally, a subset of 49 isolates were also susceptible to chlorhexidine. The isolates were susceptible to a very low concentration of chlorhexidine, which supports its use as a preferred topical treatment. These data strongly indicate that dogs without a history of recent antibiotic use, treatment failure, or recurrent infections that present with bacterial skin infections are at low risk of antibiotic resistance. If systemic antibiotics are indicated in these patients with this clinical history and presentation, clindamycin should be considered as first-line therapy, owing to its 100% susceptibility in this antibiogram and less selection pressure for antibiotic resistant bacteria, compared to alternatives such as cephalosporins.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on DOAJ: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2024.1512582