PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Streptococcus canis bacteria on healthy and sick dog eyes in Canada

By Cloet, Allyssa et al.·Published in Acta veterinaria Scandinavica·2023·Western College of Veterinary Medicine, Canada·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Streptococcus canis prevalence on the normal and abnormal ocular surface of dogs referred for ophthalmic disease in Canada.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of 59 dogs with eye problems was tested for the presence of a bacteria called Streptococcus canis on their eye surfaces. Out of 118 eyes sampled, only 8 tested positive for this bacteria, which is about 6.8%. The study found no clear link between the presence of this bacteria and factors like breed, age, or medications. This suggests that Streptococcus canis might be more common on dogs' eyes than previously thought, possibly due to improved testing methods.

People also search for: dog eye problems bacteria · Streptococcus canis in dogs · dog conjunctivitis treatment · why is my dog’s eye red · dog eye infection symptoms

Abstract

Streptococcus canis is a beta-haemolytic, Gram-positive cocci commonly identified on the canine ocular surface under both healthy and diseased conditions. The objective of the study was to determine the prevalence of S. canis on the normal and abnormal ocular surface of a canine ophthalmology referral population in Canada, and to investigate potential clinical aspects that may be associated with its presence. Included were 59 dogs (118 eyes) with unilateral or bilateral ocular disease diagnosed at the time of conjunctival sampling. A real-time PCR specific for S. canis was standardized for use with conjunctival swabs. Total DNA was extracted from 118 samples and used as template for the diagnostic assay. Samples were considered positive if amplification was detected and dissociation temperature matched a positive control. Signalment and other clinical data were also collected at the time of sampling. Of the 118 eyes sampled, 8 tested positive for S. canis (6.8%). No association between the detection of S. canis and breed, cephalic conformation, sex, age, use of ophthalmic antibiotics or other topical medications, ophthalmic diagnosis, use of systemic antibiotics or other systemic medications, or systemic diagnosis was identified. In conclusion, S. canis may be present on the ocular surface of dogs at a higher rate than previously reported. It is suggested that this may be linked to the use of PCR for pathogen detection instead of culture.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37118781/