Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Study of bone-tendon interface healing in an animal model using a synthetic scaffold and PRP.
- Journal:
- European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society
- Year:
- 2025
- Authors:
- Llorens Martínez, Xavier et al.
- Affiliation:
- Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa · Spain
- Species:
- rabbit
Abstract
PURPOSE: Biological matrices have been used to reinforce large rotator cuff tear repairs. However, rapid resorption and initial immune reactions presented challenges in clinical practice. This study evaluates whether a resorbable synthetic matrix (scaffold), used alone or with platelet-rich plasma (PRP), impacts repair processes at microscopic, ultrasound, and biomechanical levels in a rabbit model of induced tendon-bone interface injury. METHODS: An experimental study was performed on 24 rabbits. Two experimental groups (n = 12 each) and a control group (n = 24) were defined. In the first group (BioP), the internal gastrocnemius tendon was sectioned and repaired to bone using double-row sutures, reinforced with a PLC (poly-L-lactic-co-ε-caprolactone) and PLA (polylactic acid) scaffold. In the second group (BioP + PRP), autologous PRP was added to the repair. The control group received no scaffold or PRP. Euthanasia was performed at 8 weeks, followed by microscopic, ultrasound, and biomechanical evaluations. RESULTS: Microscopically, a granulomatous reaction limited to the foreign body was observed in both scaffold groups. The healing process was not altered in any group, showing good biocompatibility of the scaffold. Echographically, a greater sagittal diameter was observed in the group without PRP compared to the other groups. Biomechanically, no significant differences in rupture zones were found across groups, but the scaffold-only group required a higher maximum applied force before rupture. CONCLUSIONS: At 8 weeks, using a degradable synthetic PLC and PLA scaffold as support at the bone-tendon interface did not significantly alter the normal repair process, showed echographic and biomechanical benefits, and PRP did not show additional benefits in our experimental model.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40019536/