Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Hidden Babesia and Dirofilaria Infections in Dogs in Sri Lanka
By Ranahewa, Dilshani K et al.·Published in Acta parasitologica·2026·Department of Zoology·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Subclinical Infections of Babesia and Dirofilaria in Dogs Presented to a Veterinary Teaching Hospital: Evidence for a Silent Reservoir of Infection in Sri Lanka.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 160 dogs was tested for hidden infections of Babesia and Dirofilaria, which can cause serious health issues but often show no symptoms. Surprisingly, 35% of the dogs had Babesia and 16% had Dirofilaria, with most of them appearing perfectly healthy. Crossbred dogs were found to have a higher rate of these infections compared to purebreds. This study emphasizes the need for regular health screenings in all dogs, as these silent infections can continue to spread without any noticeable signs.
People also search for: dog Babesia infection symptoms · Dirofilaria in dogs treatment · why is my dog asymptomatic but infected
Abstract
PURPOSE: Canine filariasis and babesiosis are serious vector-borne diseases, often undetected in asymptomatic dogs. This hidden prevalence complicates disease control, as subclinical carriers may continue transmission. This study determined the prevalence of asymptomatic infections and explored potential links between breed types. METHODS: Blood samples were collected from dogs brought to the Veterinary Teaching Hospital for illnesses, vaccination, sterilization, and regular health check-ups. Babesia and filarial worms were morphologically identified through Giemsa-stained thin blood smears and Modified Knott's Technique, respectively. Infections were confirmed using conventional PCR, targeting the 18S rRNA gene for babesiosis and the 5.8S-ITS2-28S region for filariasis, following bi-directional sequencing. The prevalence and infection intensity were compared among gender, age, and breed of dogs. RESULTS: Among the 160 dogs tested, 35.0% and 16.3% were positive for infections of Babesia and Dirofilaria, respectively, of which 88.0% showed no clinical signs. A higher prevalence of Babesia infection was observed in crossbred (51%) than purebred dogs (26%; Chi square test, χ = 10.318, p = 0.001), as well as with filaria infection (crossbred 42%; purebred 1%; χ = 46.866, p < 0.05). The intensity of Dirofilaria infection (2.14 ± 5.71) was higher in crossbred dogs than purebred dogs (0.03 ± 0.30; Mann-Whitney U test, p < 0.001). Sequencing of the amplified products confirmed the presence of Babesia gibsoni and Dirofilaria repens. CONCLUSION: Asymptomatic cases of filariasis and babesiosis among dogs reveal a persistent clinical burden, with crossbred dogs acting as subclinical reservoirs. This silent transmission complicates early detection and facilitates continued spread within the domestic canine population. This highlights the importance of routine screening across all breeds to introduce preventive and control measures to curb disease persistence.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42113286/