Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Success of natural crown access for dog canine tooth root treatment
By Morris, Regan L & Hale, Fraser A·Published in Journal of veterinary dentistry·2022·Hale Veterinary Clinic Guelph Ontario, Canada·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Success of Occlusal Aperture Access for Endodontic Therapy of Canine Teeth in Dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of dogs that had endodontic (root canal) treatment on their canine teeth were checked years later to see how well the teeth held up without needing a metal crown. After an average of 4.5 years, all 29 treated teeth were still stable and none needed to be pulled. However, 5 of the teeth had some enamel fractures that needed extra care, while most showed no further damage. This suggests that root canal treatment can be successful without a crown for canine teeth, but more research is needed on the risk of fractures in untreated teeth.
People also search for: dog root canal treatment success · canine tooth enamel fracture · dog dental care without crowns
Abstract
The objective of this study was to determine the success of the natural crowns of endodontically treated canine teeth in pet dogs, instrumented and obturated using rotary driven non-taper nickel titanium files, through an occlusal access preparation, without the placement of a prosthetic cast metal crown. A search of medical records at a private veterinary dental referral practice was conducted to identify pet dogs having had endodontic treatment of one or more canine teeth over an eleven-year period (2007-2018). Follow up, performed by the same veterinary dental specialist, included a complete oral health assessment under general anesthesia and included intraoral radiography thereby allowing close visual examination of the crown and restoration as well as assessing endodontic success. Time to follow up was between two and nine years after treatment with a mean of 4.5 years. Analysis revealed that 29/29 (100%) of the treated crowns maintained their stability and did not require extraction. 5/29 (17.2%) of the treated teeth had an enamel fracture requiring additional treatment to the crown after the initial treatment; 1/29 (3.4%) had additional abrasion but did not require treatment and 23/29 (79.3%) were found to have sustained no additional damage. This study supports endodontic treatment without the placement of a prosthetic crown in canine teeth in pet dogs when an occlusal access site is used as described in this paper. Further study is required on the increased risk of fracture of the remaining unaltered canine teeth.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36285459/