Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
3D preformed titanium mesh for orbital fracture repair outcomes
By Pruksapong C et al.·2026·Department of Surgery·View original on Europe PMC →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Surgical precision and clinical outcomes of 3D preformed titanium mesh in orbital blowout fracture reconstruction: a comparative study from Thailand.
Plain-English summary
This study looked at how using a 3D-printed model to shape titanium mesh for repairing orbital floor fractures (breaks in the bone around the eye) compares to the traditional method of bending the mesh during surgery. They found that the 3D method took less time to perform and resulted in more accurate repairs, with better measurements of the eye's structure after surgery. Patients and surgeons were also more satisfied with the results from the 3D method. However, when it comes to long-term results, both methods seemed to have similar outcomes.
Abstract
<h4>Background</h4>Orbital floor fractures are frequently associated with head trauma, and the complex three-dimensional (3D) structure of the orbital cavity poses a significant challenge for accurate repair of orbital wall defects. Accordingly, this study aimed to compare preoperative titanium mesh bending using 3D-printed models with conventional intraoperative bending techniques, focusing on the accuracy of orbital geometry reconstruction and intraoperative efficiency, with the goal of determining potential advantages in optimizing surgical outcomes.<h4>Methods</h4>This study presents a comparative analysis between a prospective preoperative bending (3D pre-bent) of titanium mesh and retrospective data from conventional intraoperative bending. Clinical and radiographic evaluations of orbital geometry, along with intraoperative efficiency metrics, were assessed at both preoperative and postoperative stages.<h4>Results</h4>Sixty-four patients were included, with 32 in the 3D pre-bend titanium mesh group and 32 in the conventional bending group. Mean operative time was shorter in the 3D pre-bend group (81.07± 13.04 minutes) than in the conventional group (96.07± 4.46 minutes). The 3D pre-bend group achieved more accurate reconstruction, with orbital volume and height correction rates of 96.78% ± 4.91% and 100.62%± 3.77%, respectively, versus 94.88% ± 4.33% and 96.08% ± 5.44% in the conventional group. Patient and surgeon satisfaction was higher in the 3D pre-bend group.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Pre-bending titanium mesh using a 3D-printed model significantly reduces intraoperative time and improves orbital height correction. Additionally, this technique enhances both patient and surgeon satisfaction. However, long-term clinical outcomes remain comparable between groups.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on Europe PMC: https://europepmc.org/article/MED/41787904