PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Parasite sharing between hunting dogs and grey wolves in Europe

By Ines Lesniak et al.·Published in International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife·2017·Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Alfred–Kowalke–Straße 17, 10315 Berlin, Germany; Corresponding author., NL·View original on DOAJ

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Surrogate hosts: Hunting dogs and recolonizing grey wolves share their endoparasites

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A study found that hunting dogs living in areas with grey wolves were more likely to be infected with a specific parasite called Sarcocystis grueneri compared to dogs in areas without wolves. The researchers discovered that while overall parasite levels were similar in both groups, the risk of infection with S. grueneri was significantly higher for dogs near wolves, likely due to shared prey. To help protect your dog from these parasites, regular deworming treatments are recommended, regardless of whether you live near wolves.

People also search for: hunting dog parasite infection · how to treat Sarcocystis in dogs · dog deworming schedule · grey wolf impact on hunting dogs

Abstract

Understanding how closely related wildlife species and their domesticated counterparts exchange or share parasites, or replace each other in parasite life cycles, is of great interest to veterinary and human public health, and wildlife ecology. Grey wolves (Canis lupus) host and spread endoparasites that can either directly infect canid conspecifics or their prey serving as intermediate hosts of indirectly transmitted species. The wolf recolonization of Central Europe represents an opportunity to study parasite transmission dynamics between wildlife and domestic species for cases when a definitive host returns after local extinction – a situation equivalent to a ‘removal experiment’.Here we investigate whether the re–appearance of wolves has increased parasite pressure on hunting dogs – a group of companion animals of particular interest as they have a similar diet to wolves and flush wolf habitats when hunting. We compared prevalence (P) and species richness (SR) of helminths and the protozoan Sarcocystis to determine whether they were higher in hunting dogs from wolf areas (ndogs = 49) than a control area (ndogs = 29) without wolves. Of particular interest were S. grueneri and S. taeniata, known as ‘wolf specialists’.Five helminth and 11 Sarcocystis species were identified, of which all helminths and eight Sarcocystis species were shared between dogs and wolves. Overall prevalence and species richness of helminths (P:38.5% vs. 24.1%; SRmean:0.4 vs. 0.3 species) and Sarcocystis (P:63.3% vs. 65.5%, SRmean:2.1 vs. 1.8 species) did not differ between study sites. However, hunting dogs were significantly more likely to be infected with S. grueneri in wolf areas (P:45.2% vs. 10.5%; p = 0.035). The findings suggest that wolves indirectly increase S. grueneri infection risk for hunting dogs since cervids are intermediate hosts and occasionally fed to dogs. Furthermore, a periodic anthelminthic treatment of hunting dogs may be an effective measure to control helminth infections regardless of wolf presence. Keywords: Canis lupus, Epidemiology, Helminths, Hunting dogs, Metabarcoding, NGS, Protozoa, Sarcocystis

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on DOAJ: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijppaw.2017.09.001