Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Are dogs and cats at risk of Australian bat lyssavirus infection
By McColl, Kenneth A et al.·Published in Veterinary microbiology·2007·CSIRO Livestock Industries, Australia·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Susceptibility of domestic dogs and cats to Australian bat lyssavirus (ABLV).
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of dogs and cats were tested for their reaction to the Australian bat lyssavirus (ABLV) by giving them a small dose of the virus and observing them for three months. The cats showed some mild, unusual signs but none got seriously ill or died, and tests showed no virus in their systems. The dogs had very mild symptoms for a couple of days but fully recovered, and tests also showed no virus in them after three months. All the animals developed antibodies against the virus, indicating they had an immune response, but there were no serious health effects from the ABLV exposure.
People also search for: dog bat virus symptoms · cat rabies exposure signs · ABLV in pets · dog vaccination for rabies · cat health after bat exposure
Abstract
The susceptibility of cats and dogs to Australian bat lyssavirus (ABLV; genotype VII) was investigated by intramuscular (IM) inoculation of 10(3.7)-10(5) 50% tissue culture infective doses (TCID(50)) of virus followed by observation of experimental animals for up to 3 months post-inoculation (pi). Each experiment also included positive and negative controls, animals inoculated with a bat variant of rabies virus (Eptesicus I, genotype I), or a 10% suspension of uninfected mouse brain, respectively. Each of the ABLV-inoculated cats showed occasional abnormal clinical signs, but none died. Necropsies performed at 3 months pi revealed no lesions, and no viral antigen, in the central nervous system of any cat. ABLV could not be recovered from any cats. However, rabies virus-neutralizing antibodies were detected between 4 and 14 weeks pi in the sera of all three ABLV-inoculated cats. At 2-3 weeks pi, three of the five ABLV-inoculated dogs showed very mild abnormal clinical signs that persisted for 1-2 days, after which the dogs recovered. At 3 months pi, when all dogs were necropsied, neither lesions nor ABLV antigen were detected in, and virus was not isolated from, any dog. No ABLV RNA was detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in clinical or necropsy samples from the three ABLV-affected dogs. However, all ABLV-inoculated dogs seroconverted by 2 weeks pi, and serum antibody titres were higher than those observed in cats. CSF, collected at 3 months pi, was positive for rabies virus-neutralizing antibody in two ABLV-inoculated dogs.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17449202/