Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Seresto collars protect dogs from Haemaphysalis longicornis ticks
By Meyer, Leon et al.·Published in Parasites & vectors·2022·Clinvet Morocco·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Sustained efficacy of collars containing 10% w/w imidacloprid and 4.5% w/w flumethrin (Seresto) in dogs against laboratory challenge with Haemaphysalis longicornis (Neumann, 1901) ticks.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of Beagle dogs wearing Seresto collars, which contain imidacloprid and flumethrin, were tested for their effectiveness against ticks known as Haemaphysalis longicornis. The collars showed impressive results, with more than 90% effectiveness in preventing tick infestations for up to eight months. In contrast, dogs without the collars were heavily infested with ticks. This study suggests that using Seresto collars can be a reliable way to protect dogs from these ticks over an extended period.
People also search for: dog tick prevention collar · Seresto collar effectiveness · Beagle tick treatment · how to protect dogs from ticks
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Haemaphysalis longicornis ticks are reported on dogs from an increasing geographic range. This study aimed to determine the sustained efficacy of Serestocollars (imidacloprid/flumethrin) against experimental infestations of H. longicornis in dogs. METHODS: Twenty-four Beagle dogs previously assessed for their suitability to harbor ticks were included in the study and randomized into three groups of eight dogs each. Two of the groups were treated with collars at different time points: at the first tick infestation, dogs in group 1 had already worn collars for 92 days, while dogs in group 2 had received collars only on the previous day, thus allowing evaluation of two different treatment durations at the same point in time. Infestation of the treated groups was conducted at 1, 7, 28, and 56 days (group 2) and 92, 119, 147, 168, 196, 227, and 238 days (group 1) after collar placement. Group 3 served as untreated control and was infested whenever the dogs of the other two groups were infested. Infestations were conducted using 50 viable, adult, unfed female ticks of a US isolate of H. longicornis per dog. Ticks were removed and counted 48 h after each infestation. Health and body weight of the dogs were monitored throughout the study. The efficacy against ticks was calculated for groups 1 and 2 based on arithmetic mean values at each assessment day according to Abbott's formula. The mean post-treatment H. longicornis tick counts were compared statistically between treatments, using an analysis of variance with a treatment effect untransformed tick count. RESULTS: Dogs in the control group were adequately infested at all tick counts. Efficacy was 88.2% on day 3, however well above 90% (i.e., 98.3 to 100%) at all other time points up to day 240. Statistical analysis confirmed significantly different live tick counts (P < 0.001) between the treated groups and the control group at all time points. CONCLUSIONS: The 8-month sustained acaricidal efficacy demonstrated by the Serestocollar (imidacloprid/flumethrin) provides a reliable strategy against H. longicornis infestations in dogs.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35248151/