Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Sliding humeral osteotomy surgery for dogs with painful elbow disease
By Fitzpatrick, Noel et al.·Published in Veterinary surgery : VS·2009·Fitzpatrick Referrals, United Kingdom·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Techniques of application and initial clinical experience with sliding humeral osteotomy for treatment of medial compartment disease of the canine elbow.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of dogs with elbow pain and limping due to medial compartment disease (MCD) underwent a surgical procedure called sliding humeral osteotomy (SHO) to relieve their symptoms. The study involved 49 dogs, averaging about 3.5 years old, who had been limping for an average of nearly 15 months. After the surgery, most dogs showed significant improvement in their lameness and elbow pain within 26 weeks, with many owners reporting better function. While some dogs experienced complications, the overall results suggest that SHO is an effective treatment for managing pain and lameness in dogs with MCD.
People also search for: dog elbow pain treatment · sliding humeral osteotomy for dogs · why is my dog limping · medial compartment disease in dogs · dog surgery elbow recovery
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine medium-term clinical efficacy of sliding humeral osteotomy (SHO) for treatment of lameness and elbow pain associated with clinically diagnosed elbow disease featuring cartilage eburnation of the medial elbow compartment (medial compartment disease--MCD). STUDY DESIGN: Case series. ANIMALS: Dogs (n=49) with severe or persistent lameness attributable to MCD. METHODS: Signalment, lameness history, and preoperative imaging findings were recorded. A custom, locking, stepped SHO plate was applied to the medial aspect of the humerus, stabilizing a mid-diaphyseal transverse osteotomy, medially translating the distal segment relative to the proximal segment. Three variants of technique of application were used and outcomes compared between respective patient groups. Outcome measures included lameness scoring, anatomic measures, VAS scoring of elbow pain, and owner assessment of function. Measures recorded preoperatively, 12, and 26 weeks postoperatively were compared. RESULTS: Of 59 limbs that had SHO, 39 had preoperative focal treatment of the diseased medial aspect of the coronoid process. Mean +/- SD dog age was 45.5 +/- 37.48 months and body weight ranged from 13.6 to 46.7 kg. Mean preoperative duration of lameness was 14.7 +/- 18.50 months. Lameness improved for all limbs by 26 weeks, and resolved in 21/32 limbs. Significant improvements in postoperative elbow pain scores and most owner assessments of function were observed. Incidence of major complications requiring surgical intervention was 17.2%, 22.2%, and 4.8% for each of the 3 technique variants described. Histologic examination of 2 elbows at >12 months revealed fibrocartilage cover of medial aspect of humeral condyle. CONCLUSIONS: Canine SHO with or without focal treatment of the diseased medial aspect of the coronoid process ameliorates lameness and pain associated with MCD at medium-term follow-up. Application technique is critical to minimizing morbidity. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: SHO is appropriate for clinical management of pain and lameness in select cases of canine MCD.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19236684/