Temperature Distribution on Classical Two Needles IRE Setup Versus a Single Needle Prototype.

Abstract

<h4>Objectives</h4>Irreversible Electroporation (IRE) is a non-thermal minimally invasive cancer therapy used in the treatment of liver tumors. However, the therapy entails an electrical current flux which can be high enough to cause a noticeable temperature increase. Therefore, the analysis of the heat distribution is important: during any IRE treatment, the target area is intended to be treated with non-thermal effects, where existing thermal effects should not damage nearby sensitive structures. This article aims to compare the established two parallel needles electrode setup, used by FDA-approved electroporation delivering devices, to a single needle, multiple electrode prototype design.<h4>Methods</h4>Levels and distributions of the temperature at different distances from the applicators during an IRE liver treatment were investigated. The prototype results were collated with already published in-vivo data. All electrode configurations were analyzed numerically in COMSOL Multiphysics for different pulse protocols.<h4>Results</h4>The extension of coagulation necrosis predicted by the model matched available in-vivo data. While the maximum average temperature during pulsation was higher for the prototype (74 °C) than for the two-needle IRE setup (57 °C), the thickness of the coagulation necrosis around the conductive electrodes was in the same range for both configurations. However, the location differed completely: the necrosis engendered by the prototype was located inside the tumor, while the two-needle IRE setup created necrosis outside the tumor, potentially closer to sensitive structures.<h4>Conclusion</h4>The results highlighted the importance of heat distribution analysis for the design of new IRE needles as well as for IRE treatment planning. Proper analysis ensures that the non-thermal effects are maximized while minimizing any potential thermal damage to surrounding sensitive structures.