Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
The bactericidal effect of two photoactivated chromophore for keratitis-corneal crosslinking protocols (standard vs. accelerated) on bacterial isolates associated with infectious keratitis in companion animals.
- Journal:
- BMC veterinary research
- Year:
- 2022
- Authors:
- Suter, Anja et al.
- Affiliation:
- Equine Department
Plain-English summary
Bacterial infections in the cornea can affect pets and may lead to serious vision problems. Researchers studied two different treatment methods using a technique called photoactivated chromophore for keratitis-corneal crosslinking (PACK-CXL), which uses light to help kill bacteria instead of relying solely on antibiotics. They tested this on samples from 11 dogs, five horses, one cat, and one guinea pig, comparing a standard treatment that took 30 minutes to a faster version that took just 5 minutes. Both methods were effective at killing bacteria, and there was no significant difference in how well they worked. The faster treatment is recommended for use while waiting for lab results, as it allows for quicker care and may reduce the need for anesthesia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bacterial corneal infections are common and potentially blinding diseases in all species. As antibiotic resistance is a growing concern, alternative treatment methods are an important focus of research. Photoactivated chromophore for keratitis-corneal crosslinking (PACK-CXL) is a promising oxygen radical-mediated alternative to antibiotic treatment. The main goal of this study was to assess the anti-bactericidal efficacy on clinical bacterial isolates of the current standard and an accelerated PACK-CXL treatment protocol delivering the same energy dose (5.4 J/cm). METHODS: Clinical bacterial isolates from 11 dogs, five horses, one cat and one guinea pig were cultured, brought into suspension with 0.1% riboflavin and subsequently irradiated. Irradiation was performed with a 365 nm UVA light source for 30 min at 3mW/cm(standard protocol) or for 5 min at 18mW/cm(accelerated protocol), respectively. After treatment, the samples were cultured and colony forming units (CFU's) were counted and the weighted average mean of CFU's per μl was calculated. Results were statistically compared between treated and control samples using a linear mixed effects model. RESULTS: Both PACK-CXL protocols demonstrated a significant bactericidal effect on all tested isolates when compared to untreated controls. No efficacy difference between the two PACK-CXL protocols was observed. CONCLUSION: The accelerated PACK-CXL protocol can be recommended for empirical use in the treatment of bacterial corneal infections in veterinary patients while awaiting culture results. This will facilitate immediate treatment, the delivery of higher fluence PACK-CXL treatment within a reasonable time, and minimize the required anesthetic time or even obviate the need for general anesthesia.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35978428/