Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Safety of muscle cell therapy for urinary sphincter problems
By Williams, J Koudy et al.·Published in Stem cells translational medicine·2015·Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine and Department of Pathology, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: The dose-effect safety profile of skeletal muscle precursor cell therapy in a dog model of intrinsic urinary sphincter deficiency.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 20 adult female dogs with urinary sphincter issues had muscle cells injected into their urinary sphincter to see if it could help improve their condition. The injections contained different amounts of muscle cells, and the dogs were monitored for any side effects over nine months. The results showed that the dogs receiving 50 million cells had better sphincter pressure compared to those with lower or no injections, and there were no significant health issues related to the treatment. This suggests that this cell therapy could be a safe option for dogs with urinary sphincter deficiency.
People also search for: dog urinary incontinence treatment · muscle cell therapy for dog sphincter · dog urinary sphincter deficiency symptoms
Abstract
Locally injected skeletal muscle precursor cells (skMPCs) integrate into and restore the muscle layers, innervation, vasculature, and function of the sphincter complex in animal models of intrinsic urinary sphincter deficiency (ISD). The goal of the present study was to test the dose-effect safety profile of skMPC therapy in a dog model of ISD. Sphincter deficiency was created in 20 adult female dogs by surgically removing the skeletal muscle layer of the urinary sphincter complex. skMPCs isolated from the hind leg were expanded in culture and injected 4 weeks later into the sphincter complex at a dose of 25 million cells (n = 5), 50 million cells (n = 5), or 100 million cells (n = 5) per milliliter in a 2-ml volume. Five dogs received no sphincter injection. The measures of maximal sphincter pressure, complete blood count, and blood chemistry were performed monthly until their sacrifice at 9 months. At that point, full necropsy was performed to assess the safety of the skMPC injections. Injection of different doses of cells had no effects on the body weight, blood cell count, or kidney or liver function test results (p > .05 among the skMPC doses). Some incidental pathologic features were found in the lower urinary tract in all groups and were most likely associated with repeat catheterization. The maximal urinary sphincter pressure was higher in the 50 million cells per milliliter treatment group than in the other experimental groups (p < .05). The findings of the present study have confirmed that urinary sphincter injection of skMPCs results in no significant local or systemic pathologic features within the dose range that improves sphincter pressures.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25637189/