PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Surgical checklist lowers complications in dog pacemaker surgery

By Ward, J et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary cardiology : the official journal of the European Society of Veterinary Cardiology·2019·Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: The effect of a surgical safety checklist on complication rates associated with permanent transvenous pacemaker implantation in dogs.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of 199 dogs undergoing pacemaker implantation for slow heart rhythms (bradyarrhythmias) was studied to see if using a surgical safety checklist could reduce complications. The results showed that dogs whose procedures followed the checklist had significantly fewer major complications compared to those that did not. Specifically, only 1 out of 45 dogs with the checklist experienced major issues, while 24 out of 144 without it did. The checklist also helped ensure that dogs received antibiotics promptly during surgery, which contributed to better outcomes. Overall, using a surgical safety checklist appears to make pacemaker surgeries safer for dogs.

People also search for: dog pacemaker surgery complications · bradyarrhythmia treatment in dogs · surgical safety checklist for dogs

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: To determine whether use of a surgical safety checklist (SSC) would reduce the rate of major complications after permanent transvenous pacemaker implantation in dogs. ANIMALS: The study included one hundred ninety-nine dogs undergoing pacemaker implantation for bradyarrhythmias at an academic teaching hospital. METHODS: A service-specific SSC was developed and implemented for cardiac catheterization procedures in 2015. Medical records were reviewed to extract relevant clinical and procedural data for cases with (SSC [+]) and without (SSC [-]) a checklist. Owners or referring veterinarians were contacted for outcome and survival data. RESULTS: Major complications occurred in 25/199 (12.6%) dogs. Incidence of major complications was significantly lower in SSC [+] dogs compared with SSC [-] dogs (1/45 procedures vs 24/144 procedures; p = 0.019). Dogs with SSCs were more likely to receive antibiotics within 5 min of the first incision (p = 0.0082) and to receive antibiotics every 90 min throughout the procedure as prescribed (p = 0.001) compared with dogs without SSCs. Incidence of cardiac death was lower in SSC [+] dogs compared with SSC [-] dogs (p = 0.0012), but checklist use was not associated with increased survival time (all-cause or cardiac). On average, 91% of checklist components were completed for each SSC; minor changes in record-keeping protocols could increase compliance. CONCLUSIONS: Use of an SSC was associated with a decrease in the major complication rate and an increase in compliance with antibiotic protocols during pacemaker implantation. Results of this study support the use of an SSC in veterinary cardiology procedures.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30527533/