PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Does kinesiology taping change how healthy dogs walk

By Liu, Ching-Ming et al.·Published in Frontiers in veterinary science·2025·National Taiwan University Veterinary Hospital·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: The effect of kinesiology taping on gait variability in healthy dogs.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of healthy dogs was tested to see if kinesiology taping, often used in sports therapy, could improve their walking patterns. The study involved eight dogs of different breeds and sizes, and various taping methods were applied to their thigh muscles. Results showed that the taping had minimal and inconsistent effects on their mobility and walking style, with only a few measurements showing any significant change. Overall, kinesiology taping did not appear to make a meaningful difference in how these dogs moved.

People also search for: kinesiology taping for dogs · dog gait improvement · healthy dog mobility treatments

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Kinesiology taping is commonly utilized in sports and rehabilitation for both humans and horses. Evaluating its effectiveness includes both subjective and objective kinesiology assessments. However, there is limited research on the use of kinesiology taping in dogs. This study examines the effects of kinesiology taping on gait variability in healthy dogs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of eight client-owned dogs varying in age, breed, and body weight were recruited for the study. Three taping methods were applied to the biceps femoris muscle. Mobility, as well as static and dynamic parameters, were assessed using a scale, a stance analyzer, and a pressure-sensitive walkway for data collection and statistical evaluation. RESULTS: Kinesiology taping on clinically healthy dogs had minimal impact on mobility and stance, and only a partial intrinsic effect on gait. Only 3 of 29 kinetic and temporospatial parameters showed a statistically significant difference (&#x202f;<&#x202f;0.05) between taping types. Over days with different taping methods, the number of significantly affected kinetic and temporospatial variable items ranged between 2 and 7 out of 29, with inconsistent distribution. The effect of taping on gait also varied depending on whether hair was present or clipped. DISCUSSION: These findings suggest that kinesiology taping has minimal and inconsistent effects on gait variables in healthy dogs, with limited variation across taping methods and a moderate influence due to the presence of hair. This study provides preliminary data on intrinsic neuromuscular modulation in response to skin stimulation, enhancing our understanding of canine gait biomechanics. The insights gained may help guide future research into dynamic stability, compensatory strategies, and neurosensory responses during healthy movement in healthy dogs.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41445587/