PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Effect of hydrophobic sand litter on cat urine protein tests

By Kennils, Josh M et al.·Published in Veterinary clinical pathology·2022·The University of Bristol, United Kingdom·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: The effect of non-absorbent hydrophobic sand litter on the urine protein-to-creatinine ratio in feline urine.

Species:
cat

Plain-English summary

A study looked at how using a special type of non-absorbent sand litter affects urine tests in cats, specifically the urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPC), which helps assess kidney health. Researchers collected urine samples from 39 cats using a method called cystocentesis, then exposed the urine to the sand litter for 24 hours before testing it again. The results showed that the UPC measurements before and after using the litter were very similar, indicating that this litter does not interfere with the test results. This means that using this type of litter is acceptable when checking for protein in cat urine.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Proteinuria can be quantified through the measurement of the urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPC). Voided urine samples in cats are often exposed to a non-absorbable litter substrate prior to collection and urinalysis. Little is known about the effect exposure to such substrates has on pre-analytical variability of UPC measurements. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess agreement between UPC measurements from urine obtained by cystocentesis before and after exposure to non-absorbent hydrophobic sand for 24 hours. METHODS: UPCs were measured in 40 urine samples obtained by cystocentesis from 39 cats (baselineUPC). Urine was then exposed to non-absorbent hydrophobic sand litter for 24 hours, recovered, and repeat UPCs were measured (litterUPC). Agreement between paired measurements and the presence of any bias or error was evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis Passing-Bablok regression analysis, respectively. Cohen's kappa was used to measure agreement for the International Renal Interest Society (IRIS) proteinuria classification of samples. Observed total error (TE) was calculated for the laboratory analyzer and compared against absolute percentage changes in paired UPC measurements. RESULTS: Neither proportional nor constant error was identified using Passing-Bablok regression between baselineUPC and litterUPC. Visual inspection of the Bland-Altman plot revealed good agreement, with 95% of paired measures falling within the limits of agreement (LOA). Cohen's kappa demonstrated almost perfect agreement for the IRIS classification of proteinuria between baselineUPC and litterUPC. Absolute percentage changes of paired UPC measurements outside of the LOAs were lower than the inter-assay TE. CONCLUSIONS: Feline urine exposed to non-absorbent hydrophobic sand litter appears acceptable for UPC measurements.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35365887/