PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

How packed red blood cell transfusions change dog anemia levels over

By Morris, Jennifer L et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)·2021·Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: The effect of time on packed cell volume following packed red blood cell transfusion in anemic dogs.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of 46 anemic dogs received packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusions to help manage their anemia. Blood tests showed that the packed cell volume (PCV), which measures the proportion of blood made up of red blood cells, increased significantly right after the transfusion but then remained stable for up to four hours afterward. This means that checking the PCV immediately after the transfusion is just as reliable as waiting two hours for a follow-up test. The study suggests that pet owners can feel confident in the immediate results when their dog receives a pRBC transfusion.

People also search for: dog anemia treatment · packed red blood cell transfusion for dogs · dog blood test results after transfusion

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the PCV at several timepoints following packed red blood cell (pRBC) administration to anemic dogs and to assess if underlying cause of anemia or regenerative status significantly affects these measurements. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study from November 2016 to October 2017. SETTING: A small animal emergency and specialty hospital. ANIMALS: Forty-six anemic client-owned dogs that received a total of 50 pRBC transfusions for management of anemia. INTERVENTIONS: Blood was collected, and a PCV was obtained prior to pRBC transfusion (T0), immediately after (T1), 30 minutes after (T2), 1 hour after (T3), 2 hours after (T4), and 4 hours after (T5) the transfusion. Underlying causes of anemia were classified as hemorrhage, hemolysis, and ineffective erythropoiesis. Dogs were also categorized in regard to regenerative status of anemia and the presence or absence of expected continued blood loss or destruction. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The mean PCV at T0 was 0.15 L/L (15%). After administration of a pRBC transfusion, the mean PCV at T1 was 0.28 L/L (28%). For all other timepoints (T2, T3, T4, and T5), the mean PCV was 0.27 L/L (27%). The PCV did not change significantly over time post-transfusion (P = 0.184), and no pairwise combinations of times differed significantly (paired t-tests; P > 0.05 for all). When dogs were categorized via regeneration status and continued blood loss or hemolysis, results were consistent. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant change in PCV from the value obtained immediately after pRBC transfusion up to 4 hours post-transfusion in dogs with several different causes of anemia. These results suggest that obtaining a PCV immediately after administering a pRBC transfusion to an anemic dog may be just as reliable as obtaining a measurement 2 hours after the transfusion. This remains true for dogs with expected continued red blood cell loss or destruction.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33118669/