PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

New vapocoolant spray reduces needle pain in dogs

By Lee, Na-Rae & Han, Hyun-Jung·Published in Frontiers in veterinary science·2026·Department of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, South Korea·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: The efficacy of a novel COtopical vapocoolant spray for reducing needle-related pain in dogs.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of dogs underwent needle-related procedures, like cystocentesis and fine-needle aspiration, and were treated with a new cooling spray to help reduce pain. The spray was applied for either 2 or 5 seconds before the procedures. The dogs that received the spray for 5 seconds showed a significant decrease in pain compared to those who did not receive any spray. This new method helped manage pain effectively without causing skin issues, making it a promising option for future veterinary treatments.

People also search for: dog needle pain relief · cryoanesthesia for dogs · how to reduce pain during dog procedures

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Effective pain management is essential in veterinary needle-related procedures. Traditional methods, including infiltrative, cream, and spray formulations, have limitations such as delayed onset, inconsistent temperature control, and skin damage. This study evaluated the efficacy of a novel vapocoolant spray (VetEase, Recensemedical, Hwaseong-si, Republic of Korea) for enhanced pain relief. METHODS: Ninety cases of dogs received cryoanesthesia immediately before undergoing three types of needle-related procedures: centesis (including cystocentesis, thoracentesis, and abdominocentesis), fine-needle aspiration (FNA), and jugular venipuncture. Each procedure was divided into three groups based on cryoanesthesia spray conditions: control (no spray), group A (2 s at 2°C), and group B (5 s at 2°C). Modified pain scores and visual analog scale evaluations were recorded immediately after needle insertion to assess the reduction in pain. Pain evaluation criteria included vocalization, general movements, and other observable responses. RESULTS: Significant pain reduction was observed in the centesis procedure for the group treated with cryoanesthesia at 2°C for 5 s (Group B), with a mean modified pain score of 0.8 compared to 3.7 in the control group (= 0.001). The visual analog scale also showed a significant reduction in Group B (= 0.001). Although both cryoanesthesia groups showed reduced pain levels during FNA and jugular venipuncture procedures, the differences did not reach statistical significance. No skin complications were reported. CONCLUSION: The novel cryoanesthetic device significantly alleviated needle-related pain during centesis procedures in dogs. It provided rapid local anesthesia, eliminating the need for prolonged onset times and minimizing skin complications, thereby presenting a viable alternative to topical anesthetics.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41884302/