PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Size of incidental adrenal tumors in dogs doesn't predict cancer risk

By Cook, Audrey K et al.·Published in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association·2026·College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: The malignant potential of a canine incidental adrenal mass cannot be predicted by lesion size, but outcomes following laparoscopic adrenalectomy are excellent.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of dogs with incidental adrenal masses (In-AMs) underwent a minimally invasive surgery called laparoscopic adrenalectomy. These masses were often found to be malignant or had the potential to become malignant, regardless of their size. After the surgery, most dogs had excellent recovery outcomes, with only a small percentage experiencing complications. This suggests that even small adrenal masses should be taken seriously and evaluated for potential treatment.

People also search for: dog adrenal mass surgery · laparoscopic adrenalectomy for dogs · adrenal tumor in dogs treatment

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe demographics, imaging characteristics, diagnosis, and outcome for dogs undergoing laparoscopic adrenalectomy for an incidental adrenal mass (In-AM), compare findings in dogs with In-AMs against those with clinical adrenal masses (Cl-AMs), and identify preoperative indicators of histologic diagnosis for dogs with In-AMs. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 214 dogs undergoing laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Demographics, imaging characteristics, and histologic findings were compared for dogs with In-AMs versus Cl-AMs. Survival to discharge was determined for dogs with In-AMs. RESULTS: In-AMs were identified in 61 of 214 dogs (28.5%). Age and body weight were similar to dogs with Cl-AMs. In-AMs were more likely to be pheochromocytomas than Cl-AMs (32.8% vs 8.5%; OR, 5.25 [95% CI, 2.43 to 11.35]). Vascular invasion was highly suggestive of a medullary rather than a cortical lesion (OR, 11.31 [95% CI, 3.03 to 36.42]). Maximal mass dimension (MMD) for In-AMs was similar for pheochromocytomas, cortical carcinomas, and cortical adenomas, but smaller dogs were more likely to have a carcinoma or pheochromocytoma. A total of 20 In-AMs had MMD ≤ 2 cm, 8 of which had vascular invasion. However, 6 of 11 small, noninvasive In-AMs were malignant (3 carcinoma) or had malignant/invasive potential (3 pheochromocytoma). Two dogs with In-AMs (3.3%) died from complications related to adrenalectomy. CONCLUSIONS: In-AMs were routinely malignant or had malignant/invasive potential, irrespective of size. Vascular invasion was highly suggestive of pheochromocytoma. Short-term outcomes following elective laparoscopic adrenalectomy were excellent. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Previous recommendations to monitor noninvasive In-AMs with MMD ≤ 2 cm should be reconsidered; perioperative planning should address the likelihood of pheochromocytoma.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42019540/