PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Gene differences in soft tissue vs visceral histiocytic sarcoma

By Boerkamp, Kim M et al.·Published in PloS one·2014·Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Netherlands·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: The two main forms of histiocytic sarcoma in the predisposed Flatcoated retriever dog display variation in gene expression.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A Flatcoated Retriever diagnosed with histiocytic sarcoma, a type of cancer affecting the immune system, was studied to understand the differences between two forms of this disease: soft tissue and visceral. The soft tissue form tends to be localized, while the visceral form spreads more quickly and is more severe. Researchers found that certain genes were expressed differently in these two forms, which could help in developing better treatments for this cancer. Understanding these genetic differences may lead to improved care for dogs with this condition.

People also search for: Flatcoated Retriever histiocytic sarcoma treatment · dog cancer gene expression · symptoms of histiocytic sarcoma in dogs

Abstract

Examination of gene functions in specific tumor types improves insight in tumorigenesis and helps design better treatments. Due to the rarity of histiocytic/dendritic cell sarcoma in humans, it is difficult to accrue such knowledge. Therefore, comparative research of these cancers in predisposed dog breeds, such as the Flatcoated retriever, can be of value. Histiocytic sarcoma in the dog can be grouped into a soft tissue- and visceral form. The soft tissue form at first is localized, while the visceral form progresses more quickly to a terminal state, which might be related to variations in gene expression. Microarray analyses were performed on fresh-frozen tissue from Flatcoated retrievers with either soft tissue- or visceral histiocytic sarcoma. Expression differences of ten most significantly differentially expressed genes were validated with quantitative real-time PCR (q PCR) analyses. Q PCR analyses confirmed the significantly aberrant expression of three of the selected genes: C6 was up-regulated; CLEC12A and CCL5 were down-regulated in the visceral histiocytic sarcoma compared to the soft tissue form. The findings of our study indicate that these two forms of histiocytic sarcoma in the dog display a variation in gene expression and warrant analysis of functional changes in the expression of those genes in these rare sarcomas in man.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24886914/