PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Using cystostomy tubes to help male dogs with urinary blockage

By Greenfield, Zoe P et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2025·Schwarzman Animal Medical Center, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: The use of a percutaneous cystostomy tube as an adjunctive treatment option for dogs with idiopathic functional outflow tract obstruction.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of male dogs with a condition called functional outflow tract obstruction (FOO), which causes urinary blockage, were treated with a special tube called a cystostomy tube to help them urinate. Out of the seven dogs that received this tube, 71% had good to excellent recovery, while only 20% of the five dogs treated without the tube showed similar improvement. Although the cystostomy tubes helped many dogs, some experienced complications. Overall, using a cystostomy tube early in treatment for FOO significantly improved the chances of a good outcome.

People also search for: dog urinary blockage treatment · cystostomy tube for dogs · functional outflow tract obstruction in dogs

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Functional outflow tract obstruction (FOO) remains a challenging disease to manage in male dogs. Cystostomy tubes have been used to relieve urethral obstruction while allowing time to achieve effective medical management, avoiding the need for emergency visits and repeat urinary catheterizations. OBJECTIVES: To describe a series of dogs with FOO and categorize the most successful management strategies including medical management alone or with the support of cystostomy tubes for urinary diversion. ANIMALS: Twelve client-owned dogs with FOO were included. METHODS: Medical records of dogs presented from August 2012 to September 2021 with a presumptive diagnosis of FOO were retrospectively reviewed and findings recorded. RESULTS: Seven dogs were managed with a cystostomy tube and 5/7 (71%) had a good-excellent outcome. Five dogs were managed without a tube and 1/5 (20%) had a good outcome. Eight dogs were refractory to medical management; 5 managed with a cystostomy tube and 3/5 (60%) had a good-excellent outcome; 3 managed without a cystostomy tube and 0/3 had a good or excellent outcome. Overall, dogs with cystostomy tubes had better outcomes but also had mild, moderate, and severe complications (100%, 71%, and 71%, respectively) reported. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Most dogs that received a percutaneous cystostomy tube as part of their management plan had a good to excellent outcome, particularly when compared to those that did not, despite the high rate of tube-related complications. Percutaneous cystostomy tubes could be considered early during management for FOO to improve overall outcomes.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39701563/