PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Stem cell treatment for paraplegic dogs with spinal trauma and no

By Besalti, Omer et al.·Published in The Journal of veterinary medical science·2016·Ankara University Faculty of Veterinary Medicine·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: The use of autologous neurogenically-induced bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of paraplegic dogs without nociception due to spinal trauma.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of 13 paraplegic dogs, who had lost the ability to feel pain due to spinal injuries, received injections of their own specially prepared stem cells to see if it could help them recover. After two rounds of treatment, only a few dogs showed any improvement in their ability to walk or feel sensations, with most changes happening within the first two months. Unfortunately, many dogs did not show any significant recovery. While the treatment showed some potential, it may not be effective for all cases of severe spinal injury.

People also search for: dog spinal injury treatment · paraplegic dog recovery · stem cell therapy for dogs

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of percutaneous transplanted autologous neurogenically-induced bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (NIBM-MSCs) in paraplegic dogs without deep pain perception (DPP) secondary to external spinal trauma. Thirteen client owned dogs that had failed in improvement neurologically at least 42 days after conservative management, decompression and decompression-stabilization were included in the study. Each dog received two doses of autologous 5.0 × 10NIBM-MSCs suspension, which were positive to 2',3'-Cyclic-nucleotide-3'-phosphodiesterase (CNPase) and Microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP-2), as well as to Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and beta III tubulin. The cells were injected into the spinal cord through the hemilaminectomy or laminectomy defects percutaneously with 21 days interval for 2 times. The results were evaluated using Texas Spinal Cord Injury Scale (TSCIS), somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) and motor evoked potentials (MEP) at the admission time, cell transplantation procedures and during 2, 5, 7 and 12th months after the second cell transplantation. Improvement after cell transplantation in gait, nociception, proprioception, SEP and MEP results was observed in just 2 cases, and only gait score improvement was seen in 6 cases, and no improvement was recorded in 5 cases. All progresses were observed until 2nd month after the second cell transplantation, however, there was no improvement after this period. In conclusion, percutaneous transplantation of autologous NIBM-MSCs is a promising candidate modality for cases with spinal cord injury after spinal trauma and poor prognosis.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27301583/