Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Use of absorbable gelatin sponges to stop bleeding in veterinary
By Charlesworth, T. M. et al.·Published in Journal of Small Animal Practice·2011·View original on Crossref →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: The use of haemostatic gelatin sponges in veterinary surgery
Plain-English summary
A group of 44 dogs and 6 cats underwent surgery where absorbable gelatin sponges were used to help stop bleeding. In 49 out of 50 cases, the sponges worked well to control the bleeding, and only one pet needed a second surgery to apply another sponge. Over a follow-up period of about 13 months, there were no allergic reactions or complications related to the use of the sponges. This suggests that gelatin sponges are a safe option for managing bleeding during surgeries in pets.
People also search for: dog surgery bleeding control · cat surgery recovery · gelatin sponge for pets · postoperative complications in dogs · safe surgical materials for cats
Abstract
Objectives: To describe the use of absorbable gelatin sponges as haemostatic implants in clinical veterinary surgical cases and to document any related postoperative complications.Methods: Practice databases were searched for the product names “Gelfoam” and “Spongostan”. Patient records were retrieved and data regarding patient signalment, surgical procedure, National Resource Council (NRC) wound classification, source of haemorrhage, pre‐ and postoperative body temperature, postoperative complications, time to discharge and details of any postoperative imaging were recorded and reviewed. Follow‐up information was obtained by repeat clinical examination or telephone interview with either the owner or referring veterinary surgeon. Cases with incomplete surgical records or those which were not recovered from anaesthesia were excluded from the analysis.Results: Fifty cases (44 dogs and 6 cats) satisfied the inclusion criteria. Satisfactory haemostasis was achieved in 49 cases with one case requiring reoperation during which a second gelatin sponge was used. There were no detected hypersensitivity responses or confirmed postoperative complications relating to the use of gelatin sponges during the follow‐up period (median 13 months).ClinicalSignificance: This is the first review of the use of gelatin sponges in clinical veterinary surgery and suggests that gelatin sponges are safe to use in cats and dogs.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on Crossref: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5827.2011.01162.x