Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Hydrolysed fish and rice diet helps diagnose food allergies in cats
By Noli, Chiara & Beltrando, Giorgia·Published in Veterinary dermatology·2021·Servizi Dermatologici Veterinari, Italy·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: The usefulness of a hydrolysed fish and rice starch elimination diet for the diagnosis of adverse food reactions in cats: an open clinical trial.
- Species:
- cat
Plain-English summary
A group of 32 cats with skin itching (pruritus) were put on a special diet made of hydrolyzed fish protein and rice starch to see if it would help identify food allergies. After eight weeks, 17 of the cats showed significant improvement in their itching. When these cats were given their previous diet again, nine had a reaction, confirming they had an adverse food reaction (AFR). The study suggests that this hydrolyzed diet can be effective for diagnosing food allergies in cats, even for those that might react to fish or rice.
People also search for: cat itching treatment · food allergies in cats · hydrolyzed diet for cats · cat adverse food reaction symptoms
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of adverse food reaction (AFR) is based on an eight week elimination diet (ED) and is confirmed by relapse upon re-challenge with the previously fed diet. Hydrolysed EDs are commonly used for this purpose. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the commercially available hydrolysed fish protein and rice starch ED Farmina UltraHypo (FUH) for the diagnosis of feline AFR. ANIMALS: Thirty-two nonseasonally pruritic cats. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Pruritus was assessed with a new dual Visual Analog Scale, lesions with the Scoring Feline Allergic Dermatitis scale and Quality of Life with a validated questionnaire on days 0 and 56. Short-acting corticosteroids or oclacitinib were permitted during the first six weeks. Cats showing 50% pruritus and/or lesional improvement were separately challenged with their prior diet, fish and rice. Cats not responding to the study diet were fed another hydrolysed diet for two months. RESULTS: Twenty-five cats completed the ED: four dropped out due to vomiting and/or diarrhoea, one owing to low palatability and two were lost to follow-up. In 17 cats, pruritus improved by >50% and these underwent dietary challenges. Of these, nine reacted to their prior diet and/or fish and/or rice and were diagnosed with AFR, while eight did not relapse (and a diagnosis of AFR was considered to be doubtful). Of the eight cats in which pruritus did not improve, four underwent a second ED with no improvement. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: FUH may be a useful ED for the diagnosis of feline AFR, even in cats reacting to fish or rice.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34033172/