PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Ultrasound heart markers to screen dogs for severe lung hypertension

By Vientós-Plotts, A I et al.·Published in Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997)·2019·College of Veterinary Medicine, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: The utility of point-of-care ultrasound right-sided cardiac markers as a screening test for moderate to severe pulmonary hypertension in dogs.

Species:
dog
Breathing & coughDogs

Plain-English summary

A group of dogs with breathing problems underwent tests to check for pulmonary hypertension (PH), a condition that can worsen their respiratory issues. Researchers used a quick, non-invasive ultrasound method to look for signs of PH, but found that it did not reliably identify dogs with moderate to severe cases of the condition. Out of 43 dogs tested, 26 had PH and 17 did not, but the ultrasound markers they looked for were not effective in distinguishing between the two groups. As a result, the ultrasound method may not be a good screening tool for PH in dogs with respiratory disease.

People also search for: dog breathing problems · pulmonary hypertension in dogs · ultrasound for dog heart issues · dog respiratory disease treatment

Abstract

Dogs with respiratory disease can develop pulmonary hypertension (PH), a comorbid condition that can impact therapy and prognosis. Without confirmation using the criterion standard of echocardiography, this complication may be missed. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a simple, non-invasive screening test that may suggest PH. It was hypothesized that in dogs POCUS right-sided cardiac markers (R-SCM) at the subxiphoid view would predict moderate to severe PH confirmed by echocardiography. Forty-three client-owned dogs that underwent respiratory evaluation with POCUS and echocardiography were included. POCUS R-SCM evaluated in the subxiphoid view included subjective caudal vena cava distention (CVC), CVC>1cm, gallbladder wall edema and ascites. PH was defined by tricuspid regurgitation pressure gradient (TRPG) as mild (30-49.9mmHg), moderate (50-74.9mmHg) or severe (>75mmHg). POCUS subxiphoid views were blindly evaluated post hoc and compared to echocardiography. Chi square test and one-way ANOVA were used to evaluate correlations between POCUS R-SCM and echocardiographic diagnosis of moderate to severe PH. Twenty-six dogs with PH, and 17 dogs without PH, were enrolled. There was no significant difference in the presence or absence of any R-SCM between dogs with and without PH. When dogs with no PH and mild PH were grouped and compared to dogs with moderate to severe PH (i.e., dogs for which treatment for PH would be recommended), no significant differences in R-SCM were noted. POCUS R-SCM using the CVCview was not a sensitive screening test to identify dogs with PH in this study population.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31383421/