PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Neutrophil markers for inflammation in dogs and cats

By O Toole, Dylan S et al.Ā·Published in Veterinary clinical pathologyĀ·2025Ā·Department of Veterinary Medicine, United KingdomĀ·View original on PubMed →

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: The Value of Neutrophil Cell Population Data Parameters as Markers of Systemic Inflammation in Dogs and Cats.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

Researchers looked into a new way to measure inflammation in dogs and cats using specific blood tests that focus on neutrophils, a type of white blood cell. They found that two measurements, NE-SFL and NE-SSC, were higher in pets with systemic inflammation, which is a sign of illness. The NE-SFL measurement was particularly good at indicating inflammation, with a sensitivity of 80% in dogs and 75% in cats. This means that these tests could be helpful for veterinarians, especially when other tests aren't available. Overall, the study suggests that these neutrophil measurements could be a valuable tool for detecting inflammation in our pets.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neutrophil cell population data (CPD), including fluorescent light intensity (NE-SFL) and side scatter (NE-SSC), are promising inflammatory markers in human sepsis but remain unexplored in dogs and cats. OBJECTIVES: Determine the diagnostic utility of NE-SSC and NE-SFL for detecting systemic inflammation in dogs and cats. METHODS: Dogs and cats with archived CPD, blood films, and acute phase protein (APP) measurements were included. Increased C-reactive protein (CRP) in dogs and Serum Amyloid A (SAA) in cats were considered indicative of systemic inflammation. CPD was compared with APPs, white cell count (WCC), neutrophil count, band neutrophil count, and toxic change grade. Optimal cut-offs and associated sensitivities and specificities were calculated using ROC curve analysis. Correlations were assessed using Spearman's coefficient. RESULTS: NE-SFL and NE-SSC were significantly increased in dogs and cats with systemic inflammation. The area under the curve (AUC) of NE-SFL was higher than that of NE-SSC, WCC, and band neutrophil count in both dogs (0.82) and cats (0.77). The optimal NE-SFL cut-off for detecting systemic inflammation was > 41.7 ch in dogs (sensitivity 80%; specificity 66%) and > 37.4 ch in cats (sensitivity 75%; specificity 67%). NE-SFL was positively correlated with APPs, WCC, neutrophil count, and band neutrophil count in both species. NE-SSC was positively correlated with APPs in both species and, in dogs, also with WCC, neutrophil count, and band neutrophil count. CONCLUSION: CPD, particularly NE-SFL, is a promising marker of inflammation in dogs and cats and could be especially useful when APP quantification or blood smear examination are unavailable.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40476643/