PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Treating blocked ureter devices in cats with tEDTA solution

By Chik, Colin et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2019·Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Therapeutic use of tetrasodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid solution for treatment of subcutaneous ureteral bypass device mineralization in cats.

Species:
cat

Plain-English summary

A group of six cats with blocked ureters had mineral buildup in their subcutaneous ureteral bypass (SUB) devices, which is a common complication. To treat this, veterinarians used a special solution called tetrasodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (tEDTA) to flush out the mineralization. This treatment successfully cleared the blockage in all cases, although two cats experienced reobstruction later, which was resolved with more tEDTA infusions. One cat did need a device replacement after nearly a year. Overall, tEDTA was found to be a safe and effective option for treating this issue in cats.

People also search for: cat ureter blockage treatment · tEDTA for cat mineralization · subcutaneous ureteral bypass device problems

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Subcutaneous ureteral bypass (SUB) device placement is an increasingly popular treatment option for decompression of ureteral obstruction in cats. Mineralization occlusion of the device occurs in a minority of cases but is the most common complication. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a 2% tetrasodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (tEDTA) solution for treatment of mineralization occlusion in cats with SUBs. ANIMALS: Six client-owned cats (8 obstructed devices). METHODS: Case series. Each cat was found to have device occlusion based on a combination of ultrasound examination, SUB irrigation, and failure to identify another cause of device obstruction. Each SUB was drained, irrigated using sterile saline, and infused with 1-2 mL of 2% tEDTA solution. Success was defined as normalization of flow during subsequent ultrasound visualization while irrigating. The volume and frequency of tEDTA instillations, time to achieve device patency, follow-up biochemical and ultrasound findings, and future reobstruction events were recorded. RESULTS: Resolution of mineralization was documented in all 8 SUBs. Reobstruction events occurred in 2 cats, all of which resolved after additional tEDTA infusions, but 1 cat ultimately required device exchange at 356 days from the first tEDTA infusion. In 1 cat, a single infusion was prematurely discontinued because of persistent pelvic dilatation after 1.25 mL of tEDTA had been instilled. No complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Tetrasodium EDTA infusions can be safely considered as a treatment option for mineralized SUB devices in cats. This solution was easily infused, well tolerated, and avoided the need for SUB device exchange in the majority of cats in which it was used.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31386229/