Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Clopidogrel and rivaroxaban equally prevent blood clots in cats
By Brainard, Benjamin M et al.·Published in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association·2025·College of Veterinary Medicine, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Therapy with clopidogrel or rivaroxaban has equivalent impacts on recurrence of thromboembolism and survival in cats following cardiogenic thromboembolism: the SUPERCAT study.
- Species:
- cat
Plain-English summary
A group of 45 cats that had recovered from a serious blood clot condition called cardiogenic thromboembolism were treated with either clopidogrel or rivaroxaban to see which medication better prevented future clots. Over two years, both medications showed similar results, with about 37% of cats on clopidogrel and 39% on rivaroxaban experiencing a recurrence of clots. Some cats remained free of clots for over two years, regardless of the medication they received. This study suggests that either medication can be effective in preventing future blood clots in cats that have had this condition.
People also search for: cat blood clot treatment · clopidogrel for cats · rivaroxaban for cats · cardiogenic thromboembolism in cats
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of clopidogrel or rivaroxaban administration on recurrence of arterial thromboembolism (ATE) in cats that have recovered from cardiogenic ATE. METHODS: This multicenter prospective double-masked protocol enrolled 45 cats that had recovered from cardiogenic ATE and were randomized to receive either clopidogrel (18.75 mg/cat, PO; n = 19) or rivaroxaban (2.5 mg/cat, PO; 26) as sole anticoagulant therapy for up to 2 years after the initial ATE. Primary outcome measures included recurrent ATE or death from any cause. In addition to bimonthly internet-based surveys of animal quality of life, echocardiograms were performed by veterinary cardiologists at 2, 6, 12, and 18 months after initial ATE. RESULTS: 17 cats experienced ATE recurrence: 7 of 19 (37%) in the clopidogrel group and 10 of 26 (39%) in the rivaroxaban group. Three cats in each group survived for the entire 2-year study without recurrence. In the clopidogrel group, median (95% CI) time to ATE recurrence was 663 days (150 to not calculable) and in the rivaroxaban group, 513 days (242 to not calculable). Median time from enrollment to death from cardiac or noncardiac causes was also not different between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Single-agent antithrombotic therapy with rivaroxaban in cats recovered from cardiogenic embolism delayed recurrence of ATE for a similar time period as single-agent therapy with clopidogrel. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In cats that have recovered from cardiogenic ATE, either rivaroxaban or clopidogrel may be used for single-agent thromboprophylaxis to delay ATE recurrence.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39693732/