Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Thermal imaging to detect cruciate ligament tears in dogs
By Infernuso, Tomas et al.·Published in Veterinary surgery : VS·2010·Department of Surgery, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Thermal imaging of normal and cranial cruciate ligament-deficient stifles in dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of adult dogs, including Labrador Retrievers, with suspected cranial cruciate ligament (CCL) tears were evaluated using thermal imaging to see if it could help identify the injury. The study found that thermography could successfully differentiate between normal and CCL-deficient stifles about 75-85% of the time, even without shaving the hair on the dog's leg. This means that if your dog is limping and your vet suspects a CCL injury, thermography could be a helpful tool for diagnosis without needing to clip the fur.
People also search for: dog limping CCL injury · thermography for dog knee problems · Labrador Retriever knee pain diagnosis
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the capability of thermography for differentiation between normal stifles and those with cranial cruciate ligament (CCL) rupture in dogs, initially with a full hair coat and 1 hour after clipping the hair coat. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. ANIMALS: Labrador Retrievers (n=6) with normal stifle joints (controls) and adult dogs (n=10) with CCL rupture. METHODS: Thermography was performed before, and 60 minutes after, clipping the hair coat from the pelvic limb. Stifle images were classified as normal or abnormal, then subclassified as clipped and unclipped hair coat. CCL deficiency was confirmed at surgery and thermographic images subsequently classified as abnormal before analysis with image processing software. RESULTS: Using image recognition analysis, differentiation between normal and CCL-deficient stifles in both clipped and unclipped dogs was 85% successful on cranial images, medial, caudal, and lateral images were between 75% and 85% successful. Although there were significant increases in skin temperature after clipping in both groups (P<.0002-.0001), there were no significant temperature differences between normal and CCL-deficient stifles when the entire stifle was examined. CONCLUSION: Thermography was successful in differentiating naturally occurring CCL-deficient stifles in dogs, with a success rate of 75-85%. Clipping is not necessary for successful thermographic evaluation of the canine stifle. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Thermography may be a useful imaging modality for diagnosis of CCL deficiency in dogs when CCL rupture is suspected but stifle laxity is not evident.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20459492/