Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Measuring hip joint looseness to diagnose dog hip dysplasia
By Ogden, Daniel M. et al.·Published in Veterinary Surgery·2011·Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences Louisiana State University Baton Rouge LA·View original on Crossref →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: TheS‐Measurement in the Diagnosis of Canine Hip Dysplasia
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 51 dogs underwent testing for hip dysplasia, a condition that can cause pain and mobility issues. The researchers used a new measurement technique to assess the hip joint's stability and found that 33 of the dogs had hip dysplasia. They determined that a specific measurement could help identify dogs at risk for this condition, particularly in younger dogs. The study suggests that this new method could be a useful tool for veterinarians in diagnosing hip dysplasia more accurately.
People also search for: dog hip dysplasia symptoms · how to diagnose hip dysplasia in dogs · treatment for dog hip problems
Abstract
ObjectiveTo propose a direct measure of subluxation of the femoral head (S) in the assessment of hip joint laxity and evaluate it for clinical use.Study DesignMethod comparison study.AnimalsDogs (n = 51).MethodsDogs were sedated or anesthetized for a dorsolateral subluxation (DLS) examination. Two sets of radiographs were acquired, 1 each by a different technologist. A calibrated measuring bar was included on the image at the height of the hip to assess magnification. TheDLSwas calculated for each hip and different persons unaware of these details measured the “S”‐value. One person measured theS‐value 3 times over 3 days. Box plots were used to determine a cut‐off for the empiric (8 mm) and corrected (4 mm)S‐value.ResultsOf 51 dogs, 33 were dysplastic based on aDLSscore <55%. Magnification and body weight were strongly correlated (r = 0.4922,P= .0006). Both empiric and correctedSmeasurements showed good agreement with theDLSscore (κ = 0.688 and κ = 0.681, respectively). The correctedSmeasurement produced more false negatives.Bland–Altman analysis showed interobserver and technician variance acceptable for clinical use (limits of agreement < ±3 mm). Intraobserver repeatability was acceptable for the right hip (95% of differences were ≤1.3 mm and 100% ≤ 1.9) but not for the left hip.ConclusionUsing a cut‐off value of 5 mm, the empiricalSmeasurement can be used to exclude hip dysplasia in young dogs of various body proportions.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on Crossref: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950x.2011.00874.x