Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Blood clotting test results in dogs with severe clotting disorder
By Wiinberg, B et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2008·Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Thromboelastographic evaluation of hemostatic function in dogs with disseminated intravascular coagulation.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
Fifty dogs diagnosed with a serious condition called disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) were evaluated for their blood clotting ability. Many of these dogs showed abnormal clotting profiles, with some being prone to excessive clotting (hypercoagulable) and others having trouble clotting (hypocoagulable). The study found that dogs with hypercoagulability had a better chance of survival compared to those with hypocoagulability. The results suggest that a specific blood test called thromboelastography can help veterinarians assess the clotting function in dogs with DIC and predict their outcomes.
People also search for: dog blood clotting problems · DIC in dogs treatment · dog survival rate hypercoagulable
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is considerable variation in the coagulation profile of dogs with disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), making it difficult to assess overall hemostatic function. OBJECTIVES: To characterize the overall hemostatic state in dogs with DIC, by use of tissue factor-activated thromboelastography (TF-TEG), and to determine whether there is an association between hemostasis and outcome. ANIMALS: 50 dogs with DIC. METHODS: Dogs admitted to the intensive care units, with an underlying disease known to predispose to DIC, were prospectively assessed with TF-TEG. Citrated blood samples were collected daily during hospitalization and an extended coagulation panel and TF-TEG were performed. Diagnosis of DIC was based on expert opinion. RESULTS: Hemostatic dysfunction was observed on the TF-TEG profile in 33/50 of the dogs, of which 22/50 were hypercoagulable and 11/50 were hypocoagulable based on the TF-TEG G value alone. There were significant differences in k, alpha, and MA values (P < .0001) among hypo-, normo-, and hypercoagulable dogs. There was a significant difference in case fatality rate between hypo- (64%) and hypercoagulable (32%) dogs (relative risk = 2.38; P= .04). Dogs that died had significantly lower antithrombin activity (P= .03) and higher d-dimer concentration (P= .03) than survivors. CONCLUSIONS: The most common overall hemostatic abnormality in dogs diagnosed with DIC was hypercoagulability, and there was significant difference in survival between hyper- and hypocoagulable dogs. The results suggest TF-TEG is valuable in the assessment of hemostatic function in dogs diagnosed with DIC.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18346141/