PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Tick-borne infections in Dermacentor reticulatus ticks from dogs

By Pańczuk, Anna et al.·Published in Experimental & applied acarology·2022·Faculty of Health Sciences·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Tick-borne pathogens in Dermacentor reticulatus collected from dogs in eastern Poland.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A study in Poland found that some ticks collected from dogs were carrying harmful germs. Specifically, about 9% of the ticks tested positive for Anaplasma phagocytophilum, which can cause illness in pets, while only one tick had Borrelia burgdorferi, the bacteria that causes Lyme disease. This means that as these ticks spread into new areas, dogs and their owners may be at greater risk for tick-borne diseases. Pet owners should be aware of tick prevention measures to protect their dogs from these infections.

People also search for: dog tick prevention · symptoms of tick-borne disease in dogs · Anaplasma infection in dogs

Abstract

In recent years, the distribution of Dermacentor reticulatus ticks has expanded into new territories in many European countries, including Poland, with increased population densities in areas of their regular occurrence. The spread of D. reticulatus enhances the risk of exposure of domestic animals and their owners to tick-borne diseases. The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of infection of D. reticulatus ticks feeding on dogs with the pathogens Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato and Anaplasma phagocytophilum. The study material comprised 152 D. reticulatus ticks collected from dogs in the northeastern part of Lublin Province (eastern Poland). A ready-made AmpliSens® TBEV, B.burgdorferi sl, A.phagocytophilum, E.chaffeensis/E.muris-FRT PCR kit was used for qualitative detection and differentiation of tick-borne infections. The assessment of the degree of infection of the analyzed ticks with the two pathogens revealed that 9.2% (14/152) of the examined ticks were infected with one of the pathogens. No co-infections with the pathogens were detected in any of the ticks. The highest specific percentage of infections (8.6%, 13/152) was associated with A. phagocytophilum. The presence of B. burgdorferi s.l. was detected in only one of the examined ticks (0.7%). The spread of D. reticulatus to new territories and the increase in population density in areas of their regular occurrence implies the need for further studies of the prevalence of pathogens with medical and veterinary importance in order to assess the risk of tick-borne diseases.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35286554/