PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

How tissue factor thromboelastography shows bleeding in dogs

By Wiinberg, Bo et al.·Published in Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997)·2009·The Small Animal Hospital·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Tissue factor activated thromboelastography correlates to clinical signs of bleeding in dogs.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of dogs showing signs of bleeding were tested using a special blood test called thromboelastography (TEG) to see how well it could identify bleeding issues compared to standard blood tests. The study found that dogs with a TEG score below a certain level were very likely to have bleeding problems, with a high accuracy rate. This means that TEG could be a useful tool for veterinarians when diagnosing dogs suspected of having bleeding disorders. Overall, the TEG test performed better than traditional blood tests in predicting bleeding issues in dogs.

People also search for: dog bleeding symptoms · thromboelastography for dogs · dog blood test accuracy · signs of bleeding in dogs

Abstract

The ability of a laboratory assay to correlate to clinical phenotype is crucial for the accurate diagnosis and monitoring of haemostasis and is therefore challenging with currently used routine haemostasis assays. Thromboelastography (TEG) is increasingly used to evaluate haemostasis in humans and may well be of value in the workup of dogs suspected of having a haemostatic disorder. This study was undertaken to evaluate prospectively how tissue factor (TF) activated TEG correlated to clinical signs of bleeding in dogs, compared to a routine coagulation profile. A prospective case-control study was performed over a 2 year period from 2004-2006. Eligible dogs were those where the primary clinician requested a coagulation profile to evaluate haemostasis. The dogs were simultaneously evaluated with a TF-activated TEG assay. Twenty-seven dogs, characterised as hypo-coagulable based on the TEG parameter G (<3.2 Kdyn/cm(2)), were included in the study as cases. Size matched control groups of TEG normo- (G=3.2K-7.2 Kdyn/cm(2)) and hyper-coagulable (G>7.2 Kdyn/cm(2)) dogs were selected retrospectively from the eligible dogs. For all dogs, clinical signs of bleeding were noted at time of analysis. There were statistically significant differences between all TEG values of hypo- and normo- and hyper-coagulable dogs. Thromboelastography correctly identified dogs with clinical signs of bleeding with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 89% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 98% based on G alone. In comparison, the coagulation profile had a PPV between 50-81% and a NPV between 92-93% for detection of bleeding, depending on the observer. In conclusion, a TF-activated TEG G value<3.2K dyn/cm(2) correctly identified dogs with clinical signs of bleeding with very high PPV and NPV, irrespective of observer. The findings strongly suggest that TF- activated TEG may be of value in the workup of dogs suspected of having a haemostatic disorder.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17920966/