Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Oral dust mite treatment helps dogs with itchy skin disease
By Marsella, Rosanna·Published in Veterinary Dermatology·2010·View original on Crossref →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Tolerability and clinical efficacy of oral immunotherapy with house dust mites in a model of canine atopic dermatitis: a pilot study
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 13 beagles with atopic dermatitis (a chronic skin condition caused by allergies) were given daily oral doses of house dust mites to see if it would help their symptoms. After 7 months of treatment, the dogs tolerated the oral immunotherapy well, with no side effects reported. However, the treatment did not significantly improve their skin condition or reduce allergy-related symptoms. More research is needed to determine if this method could be effective for dogs in the long term.
People also search for: dog skin allergies treatment · beagle atopic dermatitis · house dust mite allergy in dogs
Abstract
AbstractAtopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, life‐long disease. In humans, immunotherapy (IT) is the only treatment that can alter the course of AD. Oral IT is appealing owing to the ease of administration and the potential for increased compliance. The purposes of this study were to investigate the tolerability, clinical efficacy and effects on allergen‐specific IgE of oral IT using a canine AD model. Thirteen atopic beagles sensitized to house dust mites (HDMs) were randomly divided into two groups. One group received daily oral doses of HDMs while the other group received vehicle only for 7 months. The investigator evaluating the dogs was blinded to the allocation of treatments. Prior to and after 2 and 7 months of IT, dogs were challenged daily with HDMs for 3 days concurrently, and clinical signs were scored using a modified Canine Atopic Dermatitis Extent and Severity Index (CADESI). Prior to and at completion of oral IT, serum was collected for measurement of allergen‐specific IgE. Oral IT was well tolerated, and no adverse effects were noted. Analysis of variance showed no significant effect of time, group and group × time interaction for CADESI scores. In addition, there were no significant differences in allergen‐specific IgE levels. In conclusion, it appears that oral administration of HDMs is well tolerated in these atopic beagles but that this protocol was not sufficient to induce clinical improvement. Further, longer‐term studies will be necessary to explore the potential of oral IT in veterinary medicine.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on Crossref: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3164.2010.00890.x